Lending Support for the Pay-Per-View Supporting Players

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Lending Support for the Pay-Per-View Supporting Players

    By Jake Donovan - Once upon a time, pay-per-view undercards were put together to help prime the crowd well before the main event players would take center stage. It was reason enough for boxing fans, hardcore and casual alike, to file into the arena early enough to catch the potential stars of tomorrow rather than just await the announcement the stars of tonight.

    It’s the latter that serves as the mindset for today’s pay-per-view market. Shows now carry two or three preliminary bouts more as a formality than as a conscientious effort to give the fans their money’s worth. Yesterday’s supporting role is today’s wallpaper – applied because the game says it has to be there.

    Instead of three or four fights that could serve as main events on any given telecast, we get unimaginative matchups, often fought in arenas that remain empty until fans get word that the headlining act is ready to go on. [details]
  • Avenue
    Chin Checker
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 1197
    • 27
    • 55
    • 7,931

    #2
    True ****ing Story!
    undercards are iffy nowadays no one even shows up to them

    Comment

    • Da Hammer
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 3393
      • 118
      • 152
      • 9,752

      #3
      good article undercards for the most part are a joke now. no one watches them and rightfully so cause they suck! although i gotta admit the Pac/Diaz undercard turned out to be pretty good. Sure Cortez killed the Soto fight but at least it added drama to the night...

      Comment

      • damian5000
        she could get it
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2006
        • 2176
        • 66
        • 105
        • 8,432

        #4
        I don't think Cotto v Margarito undercard is that bad. At least there are some decent names on it.

        Comment

        • The Gully Gad
          Jeffery Hype
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 42711
          • 2,053
          • 2,263
          • 54,550

          #5
          Bro what fights are on the undercard?

          I hope its half decent myself

          Comment

          • damian5000
            she could get it
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 2176
            • 66
            • 105
            • 8,432

            #6
            Miguel Cotto vs Antonio Margarito (WBA/IBF welterweight championship)
            Bernabe Concepcion vs Adam Carrera (super bantamweight)
            Giovanni Segura vs Cesar Canchila (junior flyweight)
            Michael Alvarado vs Cesar Bazan (junior welterweight)
            Almazbek Raiymkulov vs Ernest Johnson (lightweight)
            Jesus Rojas vs TBA (junior featherweight

            It's not great by any means..But it's got some halfway decent names on there. The problem is that if the undercard fights were any bigger or more popular they could be headlining their own night.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP