listen ****,all that **** that you talk about the wbo how is **** and all that,but you got a pic of margo with a ****ing wbo jacket.trick please.margo lost to williams a threat no one seem to want a part of.i aint no straight up hater like you and your type i give credit where credit is due.and stop frontin and calde hes been doing this **** for a while.bout time they gave him credit.
yer p4p list
Collapse
-
-
i aint no hater u ricans are just too sensitive about ur fighters, theyre not perfect u know they have flawslisten ****,all that **** that you talk about the wbo how is **** and all that,but you got a pic of margo with a ****ing wbo jacket.trick please.margo lost to williams a threat no one seem to want a part of.i aint no straight up hater like you and your type i give credit where credit is due.and stop frontin and calde hes been doing this **** for a while.bout time they gave him credit.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes sir. But actually official results should count so it doesn't matter.
As far as the scoring , when i watched it live i thought maybe Manny lost.
When i watched in on video without the crowd and just for scoring it for the 1st time:
1st 10-9 Marquez
2nd 10-9 Marquez
3rd 10-8 Pacquiao
4th 10-9 Pacquiao
5th 10-9 Marquez
6th 10-9 Marquez
7th 10-9 Pacquiao
8th 10-9 Marquez
9th 10-9 Pacquiao
10th 10-9 Pacquiao
11th 10-9 Pacquiao
12th 10-9 Marquez
People point out that Marquez landed more but remember in one round there was a huge disparity in his favor after Manny couldn't see and just tried to move away. That one round was the reason he landed more in compubox stats.
Whichever way you think it should've gone , it was a close fight and shouldn't be held against either fighter. To have Marquez above in the rankings because of a close fight that he officially lost is just sourg****s or extreme bias.Comment
-
i have marquez above because is my list dudeYes sir. But actually official results should count so it doesn't matter.
As far as the scoring , when i watched it live i thought maybe Manny lost.
When i watched in on video without the crowd and just for scoring it for the 1st time:
1st 10-9 Marquez
2nd 10-9 Marquez
3rd 10-8 Pacquiao
4th 10-9 Pacquiao
5th 10-9 Marquez
6th 10-9 Marquez
7th 10-9 Pacquiao
8th 10-9 Marquez
9th 10-9 Pacquiao
10th 10-9 Pacquiao
11th 10-9 Pacquiao
12th 10-9 Marquez
People point out that Marquez landed more but remember in one round there was a huge disparity in his favor after Manny couldn't see and just tried to move away. That one round was the reason he landed more in compubox stats.
Whichever way you think it should've gone , it was a close fight and shouldn't be held against either fighter. To have Marquez above in the rankings because of a close fight that he officially lost is just sourg****s or extreme bias.
all the p4p lists are subjective, just look at how the ring magazine loves hopkins
boxing is a subjective sport everyone sees it differently i dont know about u but if 3 guys tell me casamayor defeated santacruz i am not gonna believe on them blindly, unless there is some kind of more explicit rules on how to score a fight boxing will always remain subjectiveComment
-
okay let me ask you this though......i have marquez above because is my list dude
all the p4p lists are subjective, just look at how the ring magazine loves hopkins
boxing is a subjective sport everyone sees it differently i dont know about u but if 3 guys tell me casamayor defeated santacruz i am not gonna believe on them blindly, unless there is some kind of more explicit rules on how to score a fight boxing will always remain subjective
who do you think won toney-rahman?
would i be getting my 5k soon or are you waiting for it to become a no decision?Comment
-
1. Manny Macquiao
2. Joe Calzaghe
3. Miguel Cotto
4. Juan Manual Marquez
5. Bernard Hopkins
6. Israel Vasquez
7. Kelly Pavlik
8. Cristian Mijares
9. Ivan Calderon
10. Chad Dawson
Last edited by slicksouthpaw16; 07-19-2008, 08:40 PM.Comment
-
Comment