The case for a T.K.O.
1.Rahman inferred that he could not continue
The case for a No Contect
1. Toney landed very few (if any) right hands before the 3rd round. ALL OF THE SUDDEN he lands right hands and hurts Rahman
2. Rahman could not see because an accidental headbutt, meaning that means an NC if stopped before the end of 4 rounds.
I do think Rahman was kind of looking for a way out, or second-guessed his decision, but hey that's not fair why should he have to fight with one eye getting hit with right hands. AND it was Rahman's fault for the headbutt in the first place. If he wasn't sticking his head forward with his hands down it never would've happened.
ONE MORE THING.. doesn't the physician do TESTS and stuff like that to determine if a fighter cannot see out of an eye?? Like when he follows a pen with his eyes or some ****.
1.Rahman inferred that he could not continue
The case for a No Contect
1. Toney landed very few (if any) right hands before the 3rd round. ALL OF THE SUDDEN he lands right hands and hurts Rahman
2. Rahman could not see because an accidental headbutt, meaning that means an NC if stopped before the end of 4 rounds.
I do think Rahman was kind of looking for a way out, or second-guessed his decision, but hey that's not fair why should he have to fight with one eye getting hit with right hands. AND it was Rahman's fault for the headbutt in the first place. If he wasn't sticking his head forward with his hands down it never would've happened.
ONE MORE THING.. doesn't the physician do TESTS and stuff like that to determine if a fighter cannot see out of an eye?? Like when he follows a pen with his eyes or some ****.
Comment