..Is There Ever A Time When ROBBERY Is Justifiable?...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THe TRiNiTY
    Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 10079
    • 405
    • 103
    • 17,986

    #1

    ..Is There Ever A Time When ROBBERY Is Justifiable?...

    Simple question. Do you ever think that there is a time when someone getting robber is OKay, that you can deal with it? Give examples of actual fights or hypotheticals, if you can.

    Vote. Discuss.
    26
    I can think of plenty of times.
    3.85%
    1
    Yeah, sometimes.
    19.23%
    5
    The guy who does better should usually win.
    15.38%
    4
    It's NEVER justifiable.
    61.54%
    16
  • Left Hook Tua
    VATNIK
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 62306
    • 7,010
    • 1,581
    • 951,318

    #2
    tua-rahman 2 was justifiable......

    trinidad-delahoya was justifiable......

    Comment

    • MissDeeCole
      Boxing Scene Queen
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 1969
      • 117
      • 299
      • 8,888

      #3
      I dont really get this question.

      Comment

      • BOLLOCKS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 36266
        • 1,401
        • 1,537
        • 58,925

        #4
        Taylor-Spinks was good for Boxing because Pavlik-Spinks would have been boring.

        Comment

        • Left Hook Tua
          VATNIK
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 62306
          • 7,010
          • 1,581
          • 951,318

          #5
          Originally posted by RichLoc
          Taylor-Spinks was good for Boxing because Pavlik-Spinks would have been boring.
          barrera-morales 2 was justifiable because there wouldn't have been a 3rd since erik whooped marco twice already...... :-)

          Comment

          • BOLLOCKS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 36266
            • 1,401
            • 1,537
            • 58,925

            #6
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
            barrera-morales 2 was justifiable because there wouldn't have been a 3rd since erik whooped marco twice already...... :-)
            Morales never whooped Barrera. Barrera is Morales' Papi.

            Comment

            • Left Hook Tua
              VATNIK
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 62306
              • 7,010
              • 1,581
              • 951,318

              #7
              Originally posted by RichLoc
              Morales never whooped Barrera. Barrera is Morales' Papi.
              manny is erik's papi.

              barrera can be juanma's papi.

              you ever see the barreraisgod videos on youtube? that guy makes some nice videos...... ha ha ha

              Comment

              • BOLLOCKS
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 36266
                • 1,401
                • 1,537
                • 58,925

                #8
                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                manny is erik's papi.

                barrera can be juanma's papi.

                you ever see the barreraisgod videos on youtube? that guy makes some nice videos...... ha ha ha


                Yeah, I am BarreraIsGod.

                Comment

                • THe TRiNiTY
                  Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 10079
                  • 405
                  • 103
                  • 17,986

                  #9
                  Originally posted by WithAuthority
                  I dont really get this question.
                  Alright.. I'll give an example. If Andre Dirrell had lost one of those fights that he clearly won, but clearly RAN in, would you consdier it justifiable because he didn't come to fight, he came to potshot and run?

                  Or, if it set up the right fight in the long run for THIS guy to lose, do the ends justify the means?

                  So on and so forth.

                  Oddly enough, you didn't understand the question, yet you already voted. Lol. That's weird.

                  Comment

                  • Left Hook Tua
                    VATNIK
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 62306
                    • 7,010
                    • 1,581
                    • 951,318

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RichLoc
                    Yeah, I am BarreraIsGod.
                    yes...... i kinda figured that......

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP