HBO, the boxing media racists? Allert:Mayweather thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Allucard
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jun 2007
    • 5979
    • 393
    • 56
    • 12,399

    #1

    HBO, the boxing media racists? Allert:Mayweather thread

    Not just the HBO crew, the whole boxing industry and the hater fans CAN'T BEAR the thought Mayweather will remain undefeated, they are enraged when they think about it. All they want is Mayweather to return as an old man so they can have their way with him, NO MATTER WHO THE VEHICLE is, whether it is Hoya, Hatton, Cotto... Curiously enough no american black fighter is interesting as a vehicle for Mayweather's downfall, so you can say race is an important factor. Even more curious is the fact Cotto is himself a back man. Priceless is Cotto's fans claiming he isn't. The general mentality in boxing is racist. Do you think if a white welterweight built up a record as Shane Mosley did would he be thrown to the young lions at age 36? And Shane as been nothing but friendly to all people, he was even a sparring partner for Oscar (90's movie cliché where the black dude is the sidekick to help the white star gladly, even if it costs his life). In return he's a stepping stone at 36 for Cotto and gets no easy fights in between. Anyone saying Shane, retire? Hell no! They don't care, he could get permanently hurt for all they care. They will pay him a visit in the hospital and maybe a tear for tv. If he was white however he would never have moved up to fight Forrest or Winky, would have retired as soon as he slowed down with little to no noise or criticism and would remain to this date the best welterweight fighter who ever lived. Seeing what treat Calzaghe got being no more than an average to good fighter, i can certainly see that happening, ohhhh yeah.
    As a fan I'm glad Mayweather has his mind right right now. He likes to play a fool for the media but in reality he's really smart and knows exactly what's going on, the bigger picture you know.
  • 2501
    upinurgirlsguts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20211
    • 902
    • 49
    • 28,237

    #2
    you were doing so good too allucard. this thread is beyond ridiculous.

    Comment

    • Allucard
      Undisputed Champion
      • Jun 2007
      • 5979
      • 393
      • 56
      • 12,399

      #3
      Originally posted by 2501
      you were doing so good too allucard. this thread is beyond ridiculous.
      How so? What exactly is not accurate there? Care to explain?

      Comment

      • squealpiggy
        Stritctly UG's friend
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 28896
        • 2,028
        • 1,603
        • 66,600

        #4
        Curiously enough no american black fighter is interesting as a vehicle for Mayweather's downfall, so you can say race is an important factor.
        Paul Williams and Shane Mosley are names which have been put forward in the past. Also Zab Judah was picked by a few to have too much for Mayweather.

        Cotto beat Mosley and Judah and beat the guy who beat Williams too so naturally he is considered top contender at 147 lbs.

        As for Cotto being black, I don't know enough about his background to comment on the specifics of his ethnicity but I do know that if he does have a legit claim to beig black then Barak ***** is henceofrth to be known as "the Paler".

        Comment

        • -Swizzy-
          The Wolf
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 8821
          • 431
          • 330
          • 661,075

          #5
          Originally posted by Allucard
          fact Cotto is himself a back man.
          I sincerely doubt that. I don't know how you could possibly consider him black. if anything he is half or a quarter black but that doesn't make him black.

          heres a pic of cotto standing next to mosley. I don't see the blackness in him.
          Last edited by -Swizzy-; 07-05-2008, 10:22 AM.

          Comment

          • 2501
            upinurgirlsguts
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20211
            • 902
            • 49
            • 28,237

            #6
            africa is our motherland. unless they found a new point of origin. you never know with these archeologists now a days.

            Comment

            • squealpiggy
              Stritctly UG's friend
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2007
              • 28896
              • 2,028
              • 1,603
              • 66,600

              #7
              Originally posted by 2501
              africa is our motherland. unless they found a new point of origin. you never know with these archeologists now a days.
              Yes but we eveolved from africa dwelling hairy mother****ers. Hairy mother****ers don't tend to have dark skin (after all what would be the use of all that melanin if you have hair covering your skin).

              What I'm saying is that as different "races" adapted from a hairy common ancestor we developed traits useful to our environment, including black skin, extra body fat etc. It's a little more complex than that as sexual selection and genetic drift have had an impact but the impact of the environment resulted in different physiological traits within the species.

              I don't like this notion that white people "evolved" from black people, it has implications which I am not comfortable with and it is also not supported by the facts.

              Comment

              • themaestro2657
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 177
                • 14
                • 1
                • 261

                #8
                Allucard you are an unreasonable human being. Your mind is sick. God help you.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP