Nice Article about Mayweather's Bitterness.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MakeDamnSure
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 3283
    • 182
    • 237
    • 3,772

    #1

    Nice Article about Mayweather's Bitterness.

    Mayweather may have retired but is still usual, moronic self!
    Izyaslav Koza

    7/4/2008

    Racism? RACISM?!

    Ridiculous is what I say.

    If you don't know what this is in reference to you need only find retired, Floyd Mayweather's latest interview in which he blasts Jim, Larry, and the crew for being racist. Supposedly, praise towards Pavlik, and Pacquiao, and scorn towards him proves that Jim is GL Rockwell, Larry is David Duke, Max is the new Ed Norton from American History X, and Lennox is this generation's Uncle Tom.

    Floyd, if this is your way of garnering attention, good job you have mine.

    The reason you don't get half as much praise as Pavlik, or Pacquiao, from the "HBO" crew, is because you can't commit to fighting worth a damn. Rarely will you even try to blast a subpar fighter out of there, and entertain the fans as fighters, like a Pacquiao, and Pavlik routinely do.

    What makes it even more embarrassing is neither Kelly, or Manny, are as naturally talented as you, and yet you are relegated to leaching onto other fighter's fan bases, because you don't have enough of your own to earn you the money you think you deserve, since you don't entertain, or for that matter, represent them.

    Tell me Mr. "Racism" what do you POSSIBLY have in common with middle class, to lower class black people who may indeed be victims of racism?



    Whatever, let's get back to your weak argument.

    Pavlik, and Pacquiao, easily bring in the money you think you should get for fighting third tier guys like Henry Brusseles.

    It is a far cry from your masterpieces against Diego Corrales, and your absolute war with Emanuel Augustus from years gone.

    Do me a favor buddy, get a copy of your fight with Augustus, and watch it night in and night out for around a month, and maybe you will understand why you WERE so great.

    The only difference is neither Pavlik, or Pacquiao have stopped doing it yet.

    As for the assertion that the HBO crew is racist, that is malarchy.

    Jim and Larry rode the Roy Jones Jr. jock harder then Roy's pants, and Roy's women did.

    Oh and they did it for good reason.

    Roy Jones could turn even a fight against a no hoper like Glen Kelly into something remarkable.

    Newsflash: Roy was black, and his skin color had nothing to do with how great a fighter he was, is, and will be remembered as being.

    You can still get there Floyd, if only you shut up, and put out.
  • El Jesus
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 9468
    • 553
    • 191
    • 17,604

    #2
    Originally posted by MakeDamnSure
    [B]

    Whatever, let's get back to your weak argument.

    Pavlik, and Pacquiao, easily bring in the money you think you should get for fighting third tier guys like Henry Brusseles.

    It is a far cry from your masterpieces against Diego Corrales, and your absolute war with Emanuel Augustus from years gone.

    Do me a favor buddy, get a copy of your fight with Augustus, and watch it night in and night out for around a month, and maybe you will understand why you WERE so great.

    The only difference is neither Pavlik, or Pacquiao have stopped doing it yet.

    As for the assertion that the HBO crew is racist, that is malarchy.

    Jim and Larry rode the Roy Jones Jr. jock harder then Roy's pants, and Roy's women did.

    Oh and they did it for good reason.

    Roy Jones could turn even a fight against a no hoper like Glen Kelly into something remarkable.

    Newsflash: Roy was black, and his skin color had nothing to do with how great a fighter he was, is, and will be remembered as being.

    You can still get there Floyd, if only you shut up, and put out.
    This part of the article is ******.

    Roy Jones was ripped a new ******* constantly for picking his fights toward the latter part of his career. Never have i heard people praise roy for destroying no-hopers, that was the problem, and the exact same thing hes ripping mayweather for. Him fighting bruseles to get to gatti is no different than roy jones fighting kelly for the sake of buisness.

    The article also only seems to recall mayweather of 130/135 without even taking account the recent knockout of a top 10 p4p fighter. Nor does it take into account beating the hell out of zab judah.

    For the most part, this article is the exact opposite of floyds rant, both are about as equally outreagous. This article is garbage, much like mayweathers comments.

    Comment

    • warp1432
      the mailman
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 14406
      • 478
      • 347
      • 24,060

      #3
      It's funny because Hatton is way better then David Diaz or Gary Lockett. You could argue De La Hoya was better then Barrera a second time.

      Mayweather wasn't fighting scrubs. I'd rather have seen Mayweather vs De La Hoya and Mayweahther-Hatton then say Mayweather-Cintron. I'm glad we saw Mayweather-Hatton then Mayweather-Mosley too because Hatton was undefeated, good resume, etc and we got to see Cotto-Mosley which established Cotto as the #1 contender.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP