Because those are two completely different things. Style and win/loss records don't have anything to do with each other. Pac is great in his own right, and as a whole, I think his resume is equal to Floyd's. If Pac continues down this path, when his career is over, I'll rank him over Floyd in the ATG list, but comparing Pac's excitement level to Floyd's is just a straight up hating act, and I think it's BS.
Compare Pacman vs. Diaz to Wlad vs. Ibragimov
Collapse
-
-
Obviously Pacquiao was more impressive.
Wlad is a great heavyweight, but Manny the a better fighter p4p. In fact, Pacquiao is clearly #1 p4p.
Comment
-
very true.Because those are two completely different things. Style and win/loss records don't have anything to do with each other. Pac is great in his own right, and as a whole, I think his resume is equal to Floyd's. If Pac continues down this path, when his career is over, I'll rank him over Floyd in the ATG list, but comparing Pac's excitement level to Floyd's is just a straight up hating act, and I think it's BS.
of course sluggers are gonna be more fun to watch than a technical boxer.
same way darchinyan is probably more exciting that juan ma marquez but marquez is far superior technically.Comment
-
Nah...I think the fact that Mayweather on all accounts should have been able to give this type of display of awesomeness several times over but adopted the 'win this fight look good the next mentality' is the bigger slap in the face because i had to pay 4 all that **** while comparing opinions is freeBecause those are two completely different things. Style and win/loss records don't have anything to do with each other. Pac is great in his own right, and as a whole, I think his resume is equal to Floyd's. If Pac continues down this path, when his career is over, I'll rank him over Floyd in the ATG list, but comparing Pac's excitement level to Floyd's is just a straight up hating act, and I think it's BS.Comment
Comment