Who has Popkins beat that's better than a prime Kessler?!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kastrioti
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 1434
    • 50
    • 91
    • 8,038

    #21
    Originally posted by xEDDIEx
    de la hoya, winky, trinidad, arguably tarver
    WTF?!?! How would DLH beat him? By moving up to SMW? same thing with Tito, they are many weight classes above their natural weight, they would get killed.

    Comment

    • ИATAS
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 36648
      • 2,509
      • 1,953
      • 50,835

      #22
      you do know alts like this only make people dislike calzaghe more right?

      Comment

      • bsrizpac
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2004
        • 6837
        • 289
        • 21
        • 7,134

        #23
        Originally posted by ~Ironside
        WTF?!?! How would DLH beat him? By moving up to SMW? same thing with Tito, they are many weight classes above their natural weight, they would get killed.
        Yup Tito, was not effective at middleweight. Good call:

        Comment

        • Kastrioti
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 1434
          • 50
          • 91
          • 8,038

          #24
          Originally posted by bsrizpac
          Yup Tito, was not effective at middleweight. Good call:

          That's 160, not 168, huge difference, let alone that Kessler is a pretty big SMW. Tito would lose a lot of his power at 168.

          Comment

          • ßringer
            **** Subtlety
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 28180
            • 2,785
            • 2,762
            • 48,350

            #25
            What the **** is with all the Hopkins threads recently? You guys are all over his nuts. I thought I liked 'Nard but damn.

            Comment

            • THe TRiNiTY
              Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 10079
              • 405
              • 103
              • 17,986

              #26
              Tarver is better than Kessler, legacy wise. He's beaten Johnson, Jones and even Woods at this point. Kessler doesn't stack up to that AT THIS POINT. So, AT BEST, Tarver and Kessler are even. And if that's the case, Hopkins didn't lose a round and got a knockdown. Kessler was actually competitive for Calzaghe.

              No hate to anyone mentioned, I'm just not for all that baised bull****.

              Comment

              • xEDDIEx
                GRIMY
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 1511
                • 82
                • 115
                • 7,981

                #27
                why is lord13 so obsessed with bernard hopkins?

                Comment

                • ßringer
                  **** Subtlety
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 28180
                  • 2,785
                  • 2,762
                  • 48,350

                  #28
                  For the record, I can't get over how many people love to label Tito "blown up". It's all these johnny-come-lately mother****ers who don't know **** about boxing.

                  Tito fit well at Middleweight, he knocked out a prime William Joppy (who was a damn good Middleweight in his own right) when he was 32-1 (and went the distance against Hopkins of all people). There were never any doubts about how well Tito was at Middleweight until Bernard took his punk ass to school.

                  You guys are ****ing delusional.

                  Comment

                  • bsrizpac
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2004
                    • 6837
                    • 289
                    • 21
                    • 7,134

                    #29
                    Originally posted by C-Drone
                    Tarver is better than Kessler, legacy wise. He's beaten Johnson, Jones and even Woods at this point. Kessler doesn't stack up to that AT THIS POINT. So, AT BEST, Tarver and Kessler are even. And if that's the case, Hopkins didn't lose a round and got a knockdown. Kessler was actually competitive for Calzaghe.

                    No hate to anyone mentioned, I'm just not for all that baised bull****.
                    This will get you flamed by the Calzaghe ball swingers.

                    Comment

                    • warp1432
                      the mailman
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 14406
                      • 478
                      • 347
                      • 24,060

                      #30
                      Tarver and Johnson are better then Kessler.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP