It has to be Sam Peter. It's essentially a metaphor for his entire career. tarted out well enough, he got knocked down a couple of times, but he came out on top. (Or in the case of his career, he seems to be on top.)
It has to be Sam Peter. It's essentially a metaphor for his entire career. tarted out well enough, he got knocked down a couple of times, but he came out on top. (Or in the case of his career, he seems to be on top.)
It best defines him, to me.
To me to this point it's Sam Peter and Corrie Sanders.
Those fights showed the best and worst of Wlad.
But I am game for a match with Chagaev/Valuev winner.
Why does a guy claiming that Wlad isn't even a top 100 HW of all time (when there have only been 71 total champs (counting paper ones, even RJJ) ever, make a thread about his defining fight? Makes you wonder.
Why does a guy claiming that Wlad isn't even a top 100 HW of all time (when there have only been 71 total champs (counting paper ones, even RJJ) ever, make a thread about his defining fight? Makes you wonder.
Answer the question please.
I wonder what fight makes you think he is top 100.
id say up until now it's peter but who was a very limit puncher. honestly that's all he had, good power, but the guy cant even punch correctly. wlad visited the deck and came back up. so now it's this.
but he's defining win may still very well be in the future
Comment