I have questions reguarding Tyson's resume

[Jose Rizal]

Thats Tye Fields. If you wouldn't have doubted him, then your connection would be fine.

Could you kindly direct me to the page where all the Tye Fields worship started. I started reading from page 1 but all the Tyson hyping kinda turned me off.

[slicksouthpaw16]

Could you kindly direct me to the page where all the Tye Fields worship started. I started reading from page 1 but all the Tyson hyping kinda turned me off.

This is the page here, http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...188436&page=18 But if you wanted be to give you the link to the actual thread that discovered Tye Fields greatness, then i wouldn't mind doing so.

[Jose Rizal]

This is the page here, http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...188436&page=18 But if you wanted be to give you the link to the actual thread that discovered Tye Fields greatness, then i wouldn't mind doing so.

LOL... my connection actually gave way. Thanks. If you have his "greatness" link, it would much be appreciated also.

[Kilrain]

Tyson-Bowe would have been one of the best heavyweight fights of all time.

[slicksouthpaw16]

LOL... my connection actually gave way. Thanks. If you have his "greatness" link, it would much be appreciated also.

This is one of the earlier threads on ''****in fields''.http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...lds+heart+lion

[Burner]

In his early career, they were not around for him to fight, and then he went and lost to Douglas. Had he won Holyfield would have been next and maybe followed by the others.

Tyson though even at his very best still would have struggled with Holyfield,Bowe,Lewis and Mercer. Not saying he would have definately lost, but they were all capable of beating him in his prime, but the possibility existed for him to have beaten them.


I think maybe after the Douglas defeat, everyone knew Tyson wasn't the same and maybe there was some careful matchmaking. All credit to Tyson though for facing Ruddock who was the most dangerous opponent at the time.

The one and only time Tyson managed to dig farely deep in his career and fight back when someone posed him plenty of problems.

Dude the guys you mentioned werent around for Tyson to fight.

[slicksouthpaw16]

Dude the guys you mentioned werent around for Tyson to fight.

Evander was there, Mercer was there, Morrison was, Witherspoon ect. Bowe is the only one that wasn't around at the time.

[Burner]

Evander was there, Mercer was there, Morrison was, Witherspoon ect. Bowe is the only one that wasn't around at the time.

Why would a young tyson fight ALL those guys???

And I dont recall ANY of those guys saying"bring me tyson"

[slicksouthpaw16]

Why would a young tyson fight ALL those guys???

And I dont recall ANY of those guys saying"bring me tyson"

If you claim to be the best, then you have to prove it against the best opposition. I am not critizing him on not fighting ALL of them, but he could have beaten one elite fighter that was in their prime. The best fighter that he fought who was in their prime was Bruno, and that speaks for itself considering Bruno was was never elite and has been stopped previously. While Ruddock, Biggs, Frazier, and Golota were once good fighters, they were never champions and not in the higher echlon.

Also, Evander and Lewis both wanted to fight Tyson. Funny how they did their part in the deals and he never did his.

[SickmyDuck]

Carlos De Leon is in the hall of fame and also in the top 10 greatest cruiserweights of all time list. Dwight Qawi is also in that list and definitely in the hall of fame. Evander beat him twice and had only 11 fights when he beat him the first time. Foreman later defeated Michael Moorer so that definitely counts. Many observers believes that the Foreman of the 90s is better than the young reckless Foreman becuase he threw straighter shots and was more patient. He was also a better boxer.

Foreman of the 90`s also had lightining fast hands