Tweet
Should there be a third fight?
-
14Yes. They have both exposed their flaws to themselves. A third one would be a charm.64.29%9No.35.71%5 -
I say yes. Williams proved that Quintana, like some Margarito fans here argued (and were right), can't handle onslaught pressure -the guy doesn't know how to properly clinch-. Quintana proved that Williams can be comfortably hit by a slick southpaw with overhand lefts, over and over.
Plus, it's even.
I say I'll enjoy a third one. -
YES.....Quintana schooled Williams in the first fight and exposed him....Williams got revenge and caught Quintana early in the rematch, he never recovered.
Quintana gave Williams a rematch after he clearly beat him....Willliams should be fair and give Quintana a trilogy rematch too.
The first fight wasn't a fluke, Quintana can beat Willliams again in a trilogy.Comment
-
A third fight would be justified and could be pretty entertaining.Comment
-
-
Maybe somewhere 'down the line' P.Williams/Quintana 3 could happen, though not necessary. Paul closed that chapter last night, however I got the feeling that Paul is a monkey wrench in certain fanbases victory parade,hence treads about trilogys between fighters they never gave a **** about are created as a distraction to the real issue. Issue being, Paul Williams is the #2 welterweight in the world and the winner of the Margarito/Cotto fight has to see him about something before they can think about a delahoya fight or try even to get a 'lure Floyd out of retirement' fight. Tony especially, If he beats Cotto, he's 'boxed in', forced to a Williams rematch and I don't think that'll be in his best interest, career-wise. Anythng else would be a ***** move and would be considered ducking. Hell, Paul owns whatever belt Tony wears around his waist until her redeems himself. It's amazing what 24 hours can do. Ya'll have a nice day.
Comment
Comment