Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The reality of the situation is that Mayweather wants Cotto to lose to the guy he..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by c'monmang' View Post
    LOL, no he isnt you are .." Baldo was the champ! what champ did Cotto beat "..

    HE BEAt SSM, JUDAH, URKAL QUINTANA and NOW is fighing MArgarito..

    PUH LEASE WITH THIS.."who title did he take???"

    titles are like *******s
    Was SSM, JUDAH, URKAL, QUINTANA champions when they fought Miguel?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by deevel79 View Post
      Like i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.

      @140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it make Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?

      @147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?

      Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
      exactley........

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Money May View Post
        Was SSM, JUDAH, URKAL, QUINTANA champions when they fought Miguel?
        no.

        would that have mad them any better?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by deevel79 View Post
          Like i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.

          @140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?

          @147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?

          Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
          it is a good point...

          i like floyd inside the ring, and i dont think anyone can beat him right now..

          but his bitched out ways of not proving it.. irritate the living **** out of me,...

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by deevel79 View Post
            Like i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.

            @140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?

            @147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?

            Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
            You are NOT getting it. You openly discredit the fact that Baldo was the champ and Floyd fought and beat him. However, you praise Miguel when he has NEVER BEATEN A CHAMPION AND TOOK THEIR TITLE! That is the gripe that I have. All the xtra stuff u type means nothing. As I have said before, this is not so much about Cotto, but about you because you claim to be a "fan of the sport", but you are NOT real. Floyd has taken titles from guys and Miguel has become champion by fighting for VACANT titles...you down one, but uplift the other. Be real Mr. Fan of the SPORT!

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by c'monmang' View Post
              no.

              would that have mad them any better?
              I know that...the point is, dee knocks May for beating Baldo who held the Welterweight title, but Cotto has yet to take a title from a fighter.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Money May View Post
                You are NOT getting it. You openly discredit the fact that Baldo was the champ and Floyd fought and beat him. However, you praise Miguel when he has NEVER BEATEN A CHAMPION AND TOOK THEIR TITLE! That is the gripe that I have. All the xtra stuff u type means nothing. As I have said before, this is not so much about Cotto, but about you because you claim to be a "fan of the sport", but you are NOT real. Floyd has taken titles from guys and Miguel has become champion by fighting for VACANT titles...you down one, but uplift the other. Be real Mr. Fan of the SPORT!
                The opposition that Cotto faced and beat for the vacant titles, were tougher than the CHAMPIONS that Floyd took the titles from. Whats your point?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Money May View Post
                  You are NOT getting it. You openly discredit the fact that Baldo was the champ and Floyd fought and beat him. However, you praise Miguel when he has NEVER BEATEN A CHAMPION AND TOOK THEIR TITLE! That is the gripe that I have. All the xtra stuff u type means nothing. As I have said before, this is not so much about Cotto, but about you because you claim to be a "fan of the sport", but you are NOT real. Floyd has taken titles from guys and Miguel has become champion by fighting for VACANT titles...you down one, but uplift the other. Be real Mr. Fan of the SPORT!
                  LMAO.....

                  HE IS MORE OF A FAN THEN YOU.

                  VACANT or NOT..he still beat them didnt he?

                  you are saying Baldo is more creidble cuz he was the lineal champ? you know better then that son.....

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by deevel79 View Post
                    The opposition that Cotto faced for the vacant titles, were tougher than the CHAMPIONS that Floyd took the titles from. Whats your point?

                    plain and basic common sense

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      its groundhog day in this *****, son.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP