Originally posted by c'monmang'
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The reality of the situation is that Mayweather wants Cotto to lose to the guy he..
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by deevel79 View PostLike i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.
@140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it make Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?
@147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?
Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deevel79 View PostLike i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.
@140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?
@147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?
Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
i like floyd inside the ring, and i dont think anyone can beat him right now..
but his bitched out ways of not proving it.. irritate the living **** out of me,...
Comment
-
Originally posted by deevel79 View PostLike i said, what good is beating titleholders that had titles, if the titleholders are the weakest in the division.
@140 Malignaggi & Torres > Gatti. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opposition because Gatti happened to have hold of a title?
@147 Shane & Quintana > Baldomir. Does it mean Floyd fought better/tougher opoosition because Baldomir was the title holder?
Look at Floyd now. He's the WW champ, but what good is it if he's flat out refusing to fight any WW's? Titles are overrated.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Money May View PostYou are NOT getting it. You openly discredit the fact that Baldo was the champ and Floyd fought and beat him. However, you praise Miguel when he has NEVER BEATEN A CHAMPION AND TOOK THEIR TITLE! That is the gripe that I have. All the xtra stuff u type means nothing. As I have said before, this is not so much about Cotto, but about you because you claim to be a "fan of the sport", but you are NOT real. Floyd has taken titles from guys and Miguel has become champion by fighting for VACANT titles...you down one, but uplift the other. Be real Mr. Fan of the SPORT!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money May View PostYou are NOT getting it. You openly discredit the fact that Baldo was the champ and Floyd fought and beat him. However, you praise Miguel when he has NEVER BEATEN A CHAMPION AND TOOK THEIR TITLE! That is the gripe that I have. All the xtra stuff u type means nothing. As I have said before, this is not so much about Cotto, but about you because you claim to be a "fan of the sport", but you are NOT real. Floyd has taken titles from guys and Miguel has become champion by fighting for VACANT titles...you down one, but uplift the other. Be real Mr. Fan of the SPORT!
HE IS MORE OF A FAN THEN YOU.
VACANT or NOT..he still beat them didnt he?
you are saying Baldo is more creidble cuz he was the lineal champ? you know better then that son.....
Comment
Comment