to be honest i dont think the belts are all that important overall.
i mean i think the belts are good for showing who are the top fighters of a weightclass but the fans who follow boxing closely dont need the top fighter in a division to have a title to know he's the best in said division.
but if i had to make a list of most important it would be as follows:
the ring
wbc
wbo
wba
ibf
ibo
and the rest are distant after that...for example i could put the NABF title on there but its not as important as the ones i listed.
infact i'd put the ring at the top and have wba, wbo, wbc, ibf a distant second with ibo at a 3rd with the REST of the titles after that to be honest.
Whatever belt is held by the recognised best fighter in the division should be considered the most important. For example, the WBO was the most important to win in the Super Middleweight division as it was held by Calslappy. Also in the Heavyweight, its the IBF as it is held by Wlad.
Comment