vvlad or vitali?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UKDan
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2008
    • 221
    • 3
    • 0
    • 6,270

    #1

    vvlad or vitali?

    prime for prime? ill go vitali...more exciting!!
  • RichCCFC
    46-0
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 12846
    • 440
    • 132
    • 22,116

    #2
    Probably Vitali because he had a granite chin and Wlad would be scared to trade with him.

    Boxing wise though, Wlad is a lot better.

    Comment

    • T-97
      BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 14808
      • 566
      • 628
      • 22,958

      #3
      Wlad is a better boxer but Vitali had a much better chin and probably they had equal(ish) power.

      Comment

      • Flawless
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 4856
        • 182
        • 208
        • 5,849

        #4
        Vitali. To good for Wladmir.

        Comment

        • Silencers
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 21957
          • 505
          • 235
          • 32,983

          #5
          Vitali I think.

          Comment

          • UKDan
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2008
            • 221
            • 3
            • 0
            • 6,270

            #6
            also he prob would have beaten lewis if his eye hadnt been a mess and thats one hell of a name he would have had on his resume!

            Comment

            • Jim Jeffries
              rugged individualist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 20740
              • 1,376
              • 2,868
              • 54,838

              #7
              Wlad is more athletic, has a better jab, is a better boxer, slightly more power.
              Vitali has a much better chin, is more aggressive, slight edge in height though their reach is about the same.
              Heads up, I think Vitali would win. But against everyone else, Wlad would beat more people.
              Unless Vitali fights again, he will be mostly forgotten (too many years wasted kick boxing and with injuries.) If Wlad fights three more effective years, he'll go down as a top 20 ATG HW, at least.

              Comment

              • sjomcik
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2005
                • 439
                • 19
                • 0
                • 9,507

                #8
                IMO VItali would have beat Wlad...

                Comment

                • KnockoutTheFat
                  Beer Spokesman
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 5130
                  • 220
                  • 221
                  • 12,177

                  #9
                  Vitali by a KO 2 minutes and 17 seconds in the sixth round.

                  Comment

                  • The_Italian
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 1879
                    • 87
                    • 22
                    • 8,406

                    #10
                    I think overall Wlad is marginally better than vitali...

                    Vitali isnt garbage or anything like that but Wlad is the better boxer, has a FAR SUPERIOR jab...vitali does have a better chin and more aggressive...as the other poster pointed out...

                    but i think wlad would win to be honest...

                    if vitali hadnt had those layoffs and the injuries i think they might be closer overall...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP