..CHOOSE: Cotto/Margarito OR Cotto/Mayweather...

[THe TRiNiTY]

Let's say you're given the choice. You can ONLY watch ONE of these fights. Either Cotto/Mayweather or Cotto/Margarito. Which fight do you choose to watch? Keep in mind, the other will NEVER happen. EVER. It's not gonna happen later, sonner..... NEVER.

Which fight would you choose to watch, and why? I ask this question because it might bring up a lot of conversation on what's more important in boxing. What people prefer, so on and so forth. So, let's get going..

VOTE. Discuss.

[Silencers]

Hard to pick but I'll go with Cotto-Mayweather because it's more significant. Cotto-Margarito will be more exciting though.

[THe TRiNiTY]

For excitement, Cotto-Margarito. For significance, Cotto-Mayweather.

Way to pick a fight. Lol.

[THe TRiNiTY]

..Bump....

[Silencers]

Way to pick a fight. Lol.

That's why I edited it.

[THe TRiNiTY]

That's why I edited it.

Fair enough, my good man. Just sounded funny at first. Lol.

[Migs]

Cotto-Mayweather for me. As Silencers stated there is more significance to that fight. Also, the possibility of a Mayweather loss still intrigues me. I want to see how he would handle a loss if that were to happen. If not, I think a win over Cotto would silence most critics and at that point if Mayweather retired it wouldn't be met with the distaste I have for the idea right now.

[beauty]

I would rather see Mayweather-Margarito. I think it'd be better than Mayweather-Cotto. JMO.

[-Spectre-]

IMHO I think Cotto vs Margarito will be more exciting that a Mayweather vs Cotto fight.

[KING •]

i voted cotto/margarito because floyd isn't an entertaining fighter to me atleast.

running = not entertaining.