If Hatton Fought DLH, Would He Do Better Than Forbes?

[1g5a22]

you heard it hear first folks

forbes is the man....

hatton overrated.

rofl.

[MAXWELL_]

dont think ricky is overrated but forbes IS the man

[1g5a22]

dont think ricky is overrated but forbes IS the man

correcction forbes IS a man,but not THE man

malinaggi is the man......................./woman.

[MANGLER]

He's a little stronger than Forbes so that would help him, but not by much.

[Randall_Hopkirk]

No, only because of his style, he'd get stopped. Anyway Hatton >>>> Forbes.

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

No, only because of his style, he'd get stopped. Anyway Hatton >>>> Forbes.

First objective analysis of the thread.

Hatton comes steaming forward, and he is not difficult to hit with the left hook. Forbes stands there and does nothing.

That's why Hatton loses, because of his style he takes risks and that's also the reason why Hatton sells out football (real football, none of this american bull****) stadiums and Forbes doesn't.

It's also the reason why Hatton beats forbes the same way he beat Lazcano.

The ******ity of these boards is almost painful at times.

[Dorian]

Hatton would beat Oscar

[Guest]

Hatton would beat Oscar

Funny...

[Thread Stealer]

Hatton is not as defensive skilled as Forbes and would also take more chances, and therefore would get stretched on the canvas by a left hook again rather than lose a one-sided UD.

[1g5a22]

Funny...

not as funny as your obsession............

or your attempts at logical thinking.

halfwit.