It depends on the quality of opposition. Floyd may be perceived as boring, but against a fighter who can bring the best out of him, Floyd can be exciting. I can't answer this poll.
This is a really close call. I'm no fan of mindless brawling. I liked Corrales-Castillo and the Vazquez-Marquez fights because there was actually some strategy going on in those wars of attrition. Cotto is not a mindless brawler. He's very methodical, which makes him fun to watch.
But I've been a fan of boxing way too long to not appreciate the talents of Floyd Mayweather. He is one of the greatest fighters ever. Now I got you on ignore so I know you probably explained why Cotto is so much better to watch, but I'll take Floyd in a very close one.
This is a really close call. I'm no fan of mindless brawling. I liked Corrales-Castillo and the Vazquez-Marquez fights because there was actually some strategy going on in those wars of attrition. Cotto is not a mindless brawler. He's very methodical, which makes him fun to watch.
But I've been a fan of boxing way too long to not appreciate the talents of Floyd Mayweather. He is one of the greatest fighters ever. Now I got you on ignore so I know you probably explained why Cotto is so much better to watch, but I'll take Floyd in a very close one.
I agree with you when it comes to mindless brawling.
Hamed-Kelley was not a good watch for me, and I have no intent on ever watching it again.
Ward-Gatti I is the only fight I have seen that is absolutely no defense brawling that I have truly appreciated.
Comment