Which win was better for Bhop's legacy: Tito or Tarver?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ~Lucky13~
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 951
    • 123
    • 48
    • 7,140

    #11
    tarver is the only decent boxer popkins beat
    he never beat anyone his size, all he did is beat blown up welterweights
    and tarver is a bum so that shows how credible popkins is!!!
    popkins is an overrated troll!!!

    Comment

    • letsgobrady
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 6274
      • 126
      • 11
      • 12,670

      #12
      neither wins are that big imo trinidads best was at ww but that is the fight that made bernard so i would say that win was better. tarver is overrated i don't even know how bernard could of been the underdog in that fight it was probably because people thought bernard was too small but in reality hopkins is and always was a light heavyweight

      Comment

      • warp1432
        the mailman
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 14406
        • 478
        • 347
        • 24,060

        #13
        Trinidad put him on the map so Trinidad.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP