Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Timothy Bradley: "Mayweather Exposed Ricky Hatton"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    he punched from a distance, boxed on the backfoot, i.e. running, and then threw forearms and grabbed on when in close and the ref helped him every time, played along to the script

    don't talk to me about intelligence, you have no idea
    I am sorry, I'm in a bad mood.

    But you are bitching.

    Comment


    • #72
      thanks for explaining the obvious...but can anybody else "expose" it?

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by tyson View Post
        I am sorry, I'm in a bad mood.

        But you are bitching.
        Is Ricky Hatton bitching? is Lennox Lewis bitching? is David Haye bitching?

        or perhaps somewhere along the line it will click with you the ref was in the pocket of one of the fighters.

        Why you think Mayweather was bitching about refs from day 1 of the fight build-up? because he knew if a ref actually let them fight he'd get beaten, the ref was tailored to his style and totally against Hatton's.

        Comment


        • #74

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
            Is Ricky Hatton bitching? is Lennox Lewis bitching? is David Haye bitching?

            or perhaps somewhere along the line it will click with you the ref was in the pocket of one of the fighters.

            Why you think Mayweather was bitching about refs from day 1 of the fight build-up? because he knew if a ref actually let them fight he'd get beaten, the ref was tailored to his style and totally against Hatton's.
            Your an idiot Weebler who knows nothing about boxing and is too biased blind to score a fight on landed punches as you dont see what lands and what dont , Ricky caused 99% of the ref break for not punching , your like a spoiled little child that wants to blame somebody because you lost at a marbles , one day when you grow up you will realise what a delusional fool you were for half your life .

            Comment


            • #76
              Mayweather didn't expose Hatton. It was Collazo that did that...

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
                Is Ricky Hatton bitching? is Lennox Lewis bitching? is David Haye bitching?

                or perhaps somewhere along the line it will click with you the ref was in the pocket of one of the fighters.

                Why you think Mayweather was bitching about refs from day 1 of the fight build-up? because he knew if a ref actually let them fight he'd get beaten, the ref was tailored to his style and totally against Hatton's.
                Most certainly Hatton was bitching. Lewis and Haye pointed out the obvious, that the referee was ****.

                The referee may or may not have been in Mayweather's pocket, but even as a fan of conspiracies, I very much doubt that.
                Unless you provide some proof, it's all bogus theory.

                And Hatton wouldn't have won regardless of referee.
                Possibly would have made it to the 12th round, but he didn't stand a chance of winning.

                Mentally Floyd is on another level.

                Stop bitching.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by muppetman View Post
                  floyd aint nothing untill he fights cotto or tony or quintana or williams or mabey even mosley!!!!!!!
                  god damn I hope this is an alt or a joke, what a ****** ****ing prick.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
                    2501.

                    Nobody said that Floyd was an underdog. But think about it: almost 40% of HARDCORE fight fans picked Hatton to win.

                    36% is not "a lot" in your mind?
                    not at all because a figure that low is insignificant. for your argument to have weight, you need at least a little below or at half.

                    its like saying, "A lot of people were saying that Bush had no chance in winning the election." and that "a lot of people" being voters who voted for Nader.

                    its the way you make that statement trying to deceive as if there was a significant amount of people who believed what you stated.

                    check these polls for example.

                    Judah vs. Cotto

                    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...ts&pollid=4725

                    56% Cotto
                    43% Judah

                    In this instance, a Cotto fan could say "a lot of people were picking Judah to win" and he wouldnt actually be exaggerating.

                    Mosley vs. Cotto


                    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...ts&pollid=6004

                    51% Mosley
                    41% Cotto

                    Well look at that, I didnt know Cotto was an underdog against Mosley here. Regardless, you get my point.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by RodBarker View Post
                      Your an idiot Weebler who knows nothing about boxing and is too biased blind to score a fight on landed punches as you dont see what lands and what dont , Ricky caused 99% of the ref break for not punching , your like a spoiled little child that wants to blame somebody because you lost at a marbles , one day when you grow up you will realise what a delusional fool you were for half your life .
                      u are a ****** Aussie convict,

                      Ricky didn't cause the ref break, the fat bald gimp was in between them the second they touched

                      Hatton battered the Aussie loser Tszyu and he was gonna batter Mayweather too but the thing was sewn up for the home fighter (or cash cow).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP