Who has a better argument that they won their respective fight?

[Fox McCloud]

Johnson over Dawson or Hopkins over Calzaghe?

[NeXt In Line]

I'd have to say Johnson, being that I've seen many if not MOST people claim he should have won. I personally scored the fight a draw, have only watched Hopkins-Calzaghe once but I don't recall Bernard having as big of a claim to have won as did Johnson.

[Darkstar]

Johnson by far..................

[Sealhound]

I don't think Bernard threw enough punches to qualify to win a boxing match. With Jhonson and Chad I believe Chad won but it was certainly a lot closer, maybe split or 1 round in it I would think would be fairer scoring.

[Silencers]

Johnson for me.

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

Johnson won, Hopkins didn't, it's as simple as that.

Calzaghe won that fight wider than split decision, a happy medium between the 2 judges who gave it to him would be ideal. (One was too wide, the other was too close)

Johnson also won that fight wider than split decision, probably wider than Calzaghe did. Johnson took Dawson to pieces for the whole fight, parrying his shots and hitting him with hard shots the "champion" couldn't see coming.

[Mr. Philadel]

Johnson! he came forward and applied the pressure landing the harder shots that clearly had Dawson hurt numerous of times! B-Hop didn't do that, he fought off the back foot all night and didn't land anything that REALLY hurt Joe! good thread!

[Mister Casbong]

Johnson most definitely. The poor bastard.

[1g5a22]

johnson...hopkins is delusional!

glens a realist.

[Scott9945]

I'm glad this poll turned out like it did. Johnson worked so much harder than Hopkins did in their fights.