5Burowz vs. MajesticC for Joe Cal supremacy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 5burowz
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 2636
    • 128
    • 94
    • 15,497

    #1

    5Burowz vs. MajesticC for Joe Cal supremacy

    O.k., here is my contention:


    Joe C is a good, not great fighter. His best win, IMO, is Kessler. In order to be considered a great fighter in my eyes, you need to beat other great fighters in their prime. Joe simply hasn't done that. Kessler is Joe's best win, but I don't consider Kessler a great fighter by any means. Moving on...


    Joe's other good wins include: Bernard Hopkins-Hop was 43, and a former shade of himself, but it's still a good win. But, I was unimpressed with how Joe went about getting that win. It was pretty obvious Bernard didn't have much fight in him in that fight. If Joe was so great, he would've handled Bernard more easily. Joe didn't make the adjustments in that fight to make it easier for him and that's what a great fighter would've been able to do. Looking less than impressive against an old Hopkins leaves much to be desired.


    Jeff Lacy- Jeff was not some kind of great champion. Who did Jeff beat to get his titles? Syd Vanderpool for the IBF strap. Does anyone consider Syd to be a great fighter? I didn't think so. And, Lacy earned the IBO Belt from a washed-up Reid. So, those were Lacy's biggest wins going into the Calzaghe fight-hardly screams out great fighter. Jeff may have been in his prime, but I do not consider him to be worthy of people saying this is a "great" win on Joe's resume. It simply does not compute.


    Robin Reid- I admit, I've never seen this fight. However, I've heard on more than one ocassion that it was a gift decision for Joe. But, it's a win, and you have to give Joe credit for that. It's not a great win however. Why? Because Reid was not a great fighter IMO.


    Chris Eubank- Ah, "Simply The Best'. It sure was fun watching this guy fight when he was in his prime. Too bad the Joe C. fight wasn't one of those "prime" fights, because Chris would've KO'd Joe no questions asked. Some say, "Well, Eubank was only 31 when they fought". Well, my response to that is, Eubank turned pro when he was 19 and Joe C was his 50th pro fight. I think it's safe to say Eubank wasn't in his prime when he fought Joe. Was Eubank a great fighter? Yes, but not when he fought Joe he wasn't. He was past it, and I don't think that's something that can really be argued.



    Moving along...


    Joe captured the WBO belt in 97 yet didn't capture another belt for 10 years. Why is that? No, seriously, why is that? I would like some answers as to why Joe never challenged Frankie Liles in '96 or '97 for his WBA crown. That was a fight that should've been made yet it never came to fruition. My guess is, Joe didn't want none. He knew he would get outboxed by the southpaw Liles.


    Also, why did Joe C never get it on with RJJ, the best boxer of the 90's arguably? Could it be that Joe and his camp knew Joe would get outclassed? Joe had plenty of time to try and capture Jones' IBF strap yet it never happened. Once again, I believe this fight never got made because Joe knew he would lose. It's much safer to fight Omar Sheika, I get it.


    And, what about the Supermiddle WBC belt in the mid-to-late 90's and even in the new millenium. Why did Joe never challenge for it until Kessler? That belt changed hands so many times I couldn't even count. Was Joe afraid to fight Thulani Malinga and Richie Woodhall??? I'm just really stumped as to why Joe never went after the WBC belt before the Kessler fight. It doesn't make sense to me why a "supposed" great fighter would not challenge himself but rather fight in his own backyard for most of his career and choose to defend his WBO belt. Also, if memory serves me correct, he only faced ONE mandatory in his 10 years as champ of that WBO belt-don't quote me on it though.



    I guess that's about it. I believe I've made a very good case for why Joe shouldn't be considered a great fighter. One good win over a prime Kessler does not make you an all-time great. It simply doesn't.
  • 5burowz
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 2636
    • 128
    • 94
    • 15,497

    #2
    I'm waiting Calzaghe fans

    Comment

    • -----------
      -----------------
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 6207
      • 414
      • 742
      • 12,799

      #3
      no one cares

      Comment

      • T-97
        BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 14808
        • 566
        • 628
        • 22,958

        #4
        You make good points. I like Calzaghe. He is a good fighter, one of the best SMW ever though. You have to admitt it.

        Comment

        • SkillspayBills
          Garlic Butter Gang!
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 29181
          • 2,155
          • 3,739
          • 61,188

          #5
          Originally posted by GreatJoe
          no one cares
          That sig is SOOOO freaking sick man.

          Comment

          • Xplosivo
            Banned
            • Mar 2008
            • 2470
            • 183
            • 21
            • 2,669

            #6
            some more points you can add:

            lacy struggled badly against sheikha and i wouldnt be surprised if omar had got the decision in that fight, can anyone name the best fighter lacy faced? i was watching him against sheikha and my old man says ****ing hell this guy is slower than a turtle just looks like a macho man and not a boxer and he doesnt even much boxing as much.

            it is almost pathetic that everytime calzaghe fans hear the reality, they cant handle it. its either some brit pride sort of thing maybe thats why no matter what happens joe is too good for them or maybe because its britain doesnt produce quiet a lot of good fighters and because calzaghe is one of the few they have got over excited and went as far as labelling him a "great" fighter.

            chris eubank was long done and its funny how these idiots point out his age, does age only point out how a fighters prime is? i must be stuck with idiots then, eubank had a lot of wars and i wouldnt be surprised if he suffered some serious injury over these years, the fights with watson and benn were brutal. and after watson eubank clearly wasnt the same fighter anymore, because if he was he would have dealt with steve collins and carl thompson regardless. the much "done" version of him faced joe calzaghe on a few weeks notice and still calzaghe's words are till this day"he gave me one of the toughest fights of my career".

            the best win is mikkel kessler, and kessler's top win is against a guy who got knocked out by the hard hitting sven ottke [ends sarcasm] calzaghe is definately a good fighter even though i had hopkins edging him, but maybe that has to do with the fact hopkins at 43 years old is still good. i think prime jones, hopkins and toney handle calzaghe, he also struggles against a prime eubank [pre-1992] against any version of calzaghe

            Comment

            • -----------
              -----------------
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 6207
              • 414
              • 742
              • 12,799

              #7
              Originally posted by SkillspayBills
              That sig is SOOOO freaking sick man.
              haha, yea its great.


              Thanks to ree****yaluss

              Comment

              • 5burowz
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 2636
                • 128
                • 94
                • 15,497

                #8
                Originally posted by GreatJoe
                no one cares

                LMFAO!! I KNEW there would be no rebuttal. Freaking pathetic you are. You supposedly LIVE in Wales yet can only come up with "no one cares".

                If my contention is wrong, prove it.

                Comment

                • majestiC
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2005
                  • 2810
                  • 126
                  • 51
                  • 3,400

                  #9
                  when what where? lol i just had a shower, do i have to respond i seriously can't be arsed lool

                  Comment

                  • 5burowz
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 2636
                    • 128
                    • 94
                    • 15,497

                    #10
                    Originally posted by T-97
                    You make good points. I like Calzaghe. He is a good fighter, one of the best SMW ever though. You have to admitt it.
                    I absolutely think he's one of the best Supermiddleweights ever, that was never the question really. I just don't think he proved himself against the best available opponents. Can you say the same for other fighters? Sure. But, we're not talking about other fighters, we're talking about why Joe decided to fight in his own backyard for 10+ years milking a WBO belt when he should've been challenging himself to capture other titles. And, I'm not saying he automatically loses to Frankie Liles or RJJ or whoever. I just wish he would've challenged guys like that.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP