MIGUEL COTTO has never HANDPICKED!

[Technical_Skill]

who said beating Judah was an achievment? it just as an achievment as Floyd beating ..

Mosley wasnt the same that beat OSCAR but he wasnt OLD OR WASHED UP. ARE YOU A DONKEY? HE BEAT COLLAZO MORE CONVINCELY THEN FATTON DID the Quenn of 140 remember?

Oscar definitley wasnt the same that LOST TWICE to Mosley( he was worse), when Floyd beat him he had just one FIGHT IN THREE YEARS..DAYUM


try and keep up

He wasnt washed up, but cotto had faster handspeed than him?

What the **** has hatton got to do with this?

Lmao, cotto beating zab was just as much an achievement as floyd beating him? You ****ing mark, cotto got hurt serveral times in that fight, Mayweather was never hurt once by judah.

Get a tissue, wipe cotto's cum outta your eyes sweethart, and then re-watch the mosley fight, better yet, go lay on your back again, women shouldnt be allowed to discuss boxing.

Ps. Collazo broke his thumb early on you ****ing Mark

[BMWM3P]

Of course he was the KING of 140 when Mayweather and Cotto were at 140. That was understood by mostly everyone... except for you stalkers.

We couldn't beat common sense into you if we were using a chipping hammer, you are truly hopeless.

[2501]

You clearly dont understand.

Listen now.

The oscar de la hoya that fought mayweather (who was fighting at 154) was CLEARLY better than the Shane Mosley who fought miguel cotto.

Or are you saying Cotto has faster handspeed than a prime shane mosley?

Are you saying that? because thats what the case was in that fight.

Ahh, I understand now. You are saying that the Oscar De La Hoya, who lost TWO times to Shane Mosley, who everyone thinks lost to Felix Sturm (worse than people claim Shane lost to Oscar the second time), the same Oscar who got KO'd by Bernard Hopkins, the same Oscar with a 2 year lay off, was better than the Shane Mosley who remained active, who CONVINCINGLY beat Luis Collazo, the same Luis Collazo who most believed Hatton lost to, the same Hatton that YOU and your sister IN THIS THREAD are using as a great victory for Floyd. Hmmmm

So what you are saying is that a win against Oscar is better than a win against Mosley? So if someone thinks other wise, they dont know **** about Boxing right? Wow, well, there must be a lot of idiots on this site according to this poll....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155546&highlight=impressive

How do you explain that? Oh oh oh, let me guess, only FLOYD groupies are educated on the truth right? Only FLOYD groupies know boxing while everyone else knows **** right?

The fact is, both DLH and Mosley are past their prime, but Mosley has proven to have performed the best recently while DLH has not. He confirmed this with the Forbes fight that even Teddy Atlas wasnt impressed with. But let me guess, Teddy Atlas is just bitter and jealous of Floyd and Oscar right?

[C'MONMANG']

He wasnt washed up, but cotto had faster handspeed than him?

What the **** has hatton got to do with this?

Lmao, cotto beating zab was just as much an achievement as floyd beating him? You ****ing mark, cotto got hurt serveral times in that fight, Mayweather was never hurt once by judah.

Get a tissue, wipe cotto's cum outta your eyes sweethart, and then re-watch the mosley fight, better yet, go lay on your back again, women shouldnt be allowed to discuss boxing.

Ps. Collazo broke his thumb early on you ****ing Mark

Cotto had better timing, not hand speed, learn to watch boxing Ho.

Cotto STOPPED Judah, just like the rest of their common opponents, ahem.

Collazo may have broke his thumb but stfw? he LOSS A WIDE UD. he nearly took Hatton head off at the end of there fight, He beat the piss outta poor ol Ricky and forced him back t 140..LMAO...

[C'MONMANG']

Ahh, I understand now. You are saying that the Oscar De La Hoya, who lost TWO times to Shane Mosley, who everyone thinks lost to Felix Sturm (worse than people claim Shane lost to Oscar the second time), the same Oscar who got KO'd by Bernard Hopkins, the same Oscar with a 2 year lay off, was better than the Shane Mosley who remained active, who CONVINCINGLY beat Luis Collazo, the same Luis Collazo who most believed Hatton lost to, the same Hatton that YOU and your sister IN THIS THREAD are using as a great victory for Floyd. Hmmmm

So what you are saying is that a win against Oscar is better than a win against Mosley? So if someone thinks other wise, they dont know **** about Boxing right? Wow, well, there must be a lot of idiots on this site according to this poll....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155546&highlight=impressive

How do you explain that? Oh oh oh, let me guess, only FLOYD groupies are educated on the truth right? Only FLOYD groupies know boxing while everyone else knows **** right?

The fact is, both DLH and Mosley are past their prime, but Mosley has proven to have performed the best recently while DLH has not. He confirmed this with the Forbes fight that even Teddy Atlas wasnt impressed with. But let me guess, Teddy Atlas is just bitter and jealous of Floyd and Oscar right?

[TonyJ]

Ahh, I understand now. You are saying that the Oscar De La Hoya, who lost TWO times to Shane Mosley, who everyone thinks lost to Felix Sturm (worse than people claim Shane lost to Oscar the second time), the same Oscar who got KO'd by Bernard Hopkins, the same Oscar with a 2 year lay off, was better than the Shane Mosley who remained active, who CONVINCINGLY beat Luis Collazo, the same Luis Collazo who most believed Hatton lost to, the same Hatton that YOU and your sister IN THIS THREAD are using as a great victory for Floyd. Hmmmm

So what you are saying is that a win against Oscar is better than a win against Mosley? So if someone thinks other wise, they dont know **** about Boxing right? Wow, well, there must be a lot of idiots on this site according to this poll....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155546&highlight=impressive

How do you explain that? Oh oh oh, let me guess, only FLOYD groupies are educated on the truth right? Only FLOYD groupies know boxing while everyone else knows **** right?

The fact is, both DLH and Mosley are past their prime, but Mosley has proven to have performed the best recently while DLH has not. He confirmed this with the Forbes fight that even Teddy Atlas wasnt impressed with. But let me guess, Teddy Atlas is just bitter and jealous of Floyd and Oscar right?

[Technical_Skill]

Ahh, I understand now. You are saying that the Oscar De La Hoya, who lost TWO times to Shane Mosley, who everyone thinks lost to Felix Sturm (worse than people claim Shane lost to Oscar the second time), the same Oscar who got KO'd by Bernard Hopkins, the same Oscar with a 2 year lay off, was better than the Shane Mosley who remained active, who CONVINCINGLY beat Luis Collazo, the same Luis Collazo who most believed Hatton lost to, the same Hatton that YOU and your sister IN THIS THREAD are using as a great victory for Floyd. Hmmmm

So what you are saying is that a win against Oscar is better than a win against Mosley? So if someone thinks other wise, they dont know **** about Boxing right? Wow, well, there must be a lot of idiots on this site according to this poll....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155546&highlight=impressive

How do you explain that? Oh oh oh, let me guess, only FLOYD groupies are educated on the truth right? Only FLOYD groupies know boxing while everyone else knows **** right?

The fact is, both DLH and Mosley are past their prime, but Mosley has proven to have performed the best recently while DLH has not. He confirmed this with the Forbes fight that even Teddy Atlas wasnt impressed with. But let me guess, Teddy Atlas is just bitter and jealous of Floyd and Oscar right?

**** me, is this wind up or summin

1) De La hoya lost to hopkins at 160

2) So what people though DLH lost to sturm, people thought moesly lost to DLH the second time, so your ****ing yourself in the ass the with your own logic.

3) Colazzo broke his thumb and for the last time, what the **** has ricky hatton gotta do with anything mark?

4) I use my head to recognise a boxers skills, you use your skills to give head, there is a difference.

Now one more time, **** the past, ARE YOU SAYING MOSLEY WAS IN HIS PRIME IN THAT FIGHT WHEN COTTO HAS FASTER HANDSPEED THEN HIM? BECAUSE THEN YOU ARE SAYING COTTO HAS MORE HANDSPEED THAN A PRIME MOSLEY.

one question just ****ing answer, or go back to having your ass loaned out by cotto.

Ps. Mayweather MOVED UP to fight de la hoya at 154 moron, cotto fought mosley at 147.

5) **** you, and **** your poll, you smoke cotto's pole, end of story.

[2501]

5) **** you, and **** your poll, you smoke cotto's pole, end of story.

i love it when you talk dirty to me i guess them peoples who voted that a win over Mosley was more impressive smoke Cotto's pole too. hmm

[VIVA MEXICO!!]

cotto has fought some easy fights but he has never ran away from the best when they were ready to step up.

[Technical_Skill]

i love it when you talk dirty to me

So you cant answer the question then?

Or is one of the other hoes gonna help you out again?