Floyd Mayweather Is Not As Good As He And His Fervent Admirers Think...

[Brandish]

I think he was special at 130, the way he fought and the opponents he faced, just was asking about the belts at 140 and 147 as in compasrison to the competition of his other conquests.

floyd has faced 2 out of the three best fighters at 140 in zab and hatton and beat both decisively. the fact that cotto, and hatton did not have the balls to face floyd at 140 is not a knock on hsi career at that weight he still whipped the number #1 ranked fighter at 140 who was gatti whether you agree or not. and he still erased any doubts by beating the **** out of hatton who did not want to put his title on the line against floyd

That was all I was aking, If you can't respect a fellow poster for asking questions, then i guess no real dialogue can take place.

you haven't asked one legitimate question in this thread, just stick to hating it's what your best at.

Check it out, the guy that I root for would be Oscar, but i like james Toney and aaron Pryor just as much. Osacr is 6 division champ, if you were to ask me if some of the belts were against lessser opponenst or not as impressive as the other belts he had, i would say yes. The 130 and 160 belts in comparison to the others are of less impressive fashion, that was the whole point of my question, am not here to hate on any fighter.

floyd is not in the same boat as oscar or toney he beat legit highly ranked champions in all 5 weight classes. who the **** have jimmie bredahl and felix sturm beat that compare to gatti's and baldomir's career

[Lazy Liberal]

floyd has faced 2 out of the three best fighters at 140 in zab and hatton and beat both decisively. the fact that cotto, and hatton did not have the balls to face floyd at 140 is not a knock on hsi career at that weight he still whipped the number #1 ranked fighter at 140 who was gatti whether you agree or not. and he still erased any doubts by beating the **** out of hatton who did not want to put his title on the line against floyd



you haven't asked one legitimate question in this thread, just stick to hating it's what your best at.





floyd is not in the same boat as oscar or toney he beat legit highly ranked champions in all 5 weight classes. who the **** have jimmie bredahl and felix sturm beat that compare to gatti's and baldomir's career

You my senile friend are an selective reader. I said the belts at 130 and 160 were not impressive compared to his other belts, you simp. Learn to read, then call whoever you want a hater.

[Brandish]

You my senile friend are an selective reader. I said the belts at 130 and 160 were not impressive compared to his other belts, you simp. Learn to read, then call whoever you want a hater.

is that the best you can do. once agian are you saying floyd did not fight legitimate champions at 140 and 147 if that's is your position you are a hater.

[Lazy Liberal]

is that the best you can do. once agian are you saying floyd did not fight legitimate champions at 140 and 147 if that's is your position you are a hater.

Is that you leonard? Once again????????????? Read, comprehend and then state.

[deevel79]

Is that you leonard? Once again????????????? Read, comprehend and then state.

I think it is Ellerbe. Remeber during the Hatton/Floyd 24/7, how Ellerbe was online at 2am when Floyd called him? He was on Bscene! lol.

[Lazy Liberal]

I think it is Ellerbe. Remeber during the Hatton/Floyd 24/7, how Ellerbe was online at 2am when Floyd called him? He was on Bscene! lol.

Somethin. I have never seen someone defend a fighter as much as this guy, if i said I didn't like Floyds jab in the 3 rd rd, he would call me a hater. This is absurd, we all have favorites and all, and most would be objective about their fighter, but this guy is irrational.

[pbftxrs316]

Miguel Cotto > Floyd Mayweather

And you can't deal with it...

It's okay...

no according to the ring magazine, or wbc, or consensus p4p list. cotto is behind pacman, floyd, and joe i believe. so your little posts hold no merit.

[Brandish]

Somethin. I have never seen someone defend a fighter as much as this guy, if i said I didn't like Floyds jab in the 3 rd rd, he would call me a hater. This is absurd, we all have favorites and all, and most would be objective about their fighter, but this guy is irrational.

whatever, you start that **** about floyd at 140 and 147 you better have your ducks in a row or you will get ****ing

[Talon]

i think mayweather tried to fight the best until 2002. when he fought castillo and lost he decided never to take a risky fight ever again.

burner you can post all the crap you want but actions speak louder the words and mayweather has proven he is nothing more than a ducker and a dodger.

after reading this i watched the fight. its true castillo got robbed and it is quite obvious if you just watch the end of the program. lampley and merchant think he was robbed and castillo had more landed and higher % and they were harder.

[KING •]

It does hold merit. It's an opinion.

**** Ring Magazines ranking.