Why two of these threads? Anyway, same thing, once again:
I think you're right on the "money" (pardon the pun). Oscar could've won the last fight if he hadn't quit jabbing. He's got a beautiful jab; crisp and snappy, and it landed on Mayweather nearly every time he threw it. Unfortunately, he quit using it, and started trying to walk Floyd down and unload power punches instead. What he should've done, and should do in their next fight, is throw 50 or more jabs per round for the first 6 rounds, and then start hooking off it it, following it with a right uppercut and then finishing with another hook. That'll be the key to putting Floyd on ***** street. The only punches that'll land cleanly will be the starting jab, and the ending hook, but those are the only punches that need to land, in my opinion.
Why two of these threads? Anyway, same thing, once again:
I think you're right on the "money" (pardon the pun). Oscar could've won the last fight if he hadn't quit jabbing. He's got a beautiful jab; crisp and snappy, and it landed on Mayweather nearly every time he threw it. Unfortunately, he quit using it, and started trying to walk Floyd down and unload power punches instead. What he should've done, and should do in their next fight, is throw 50 or more jabs per round for the first 6 rounds, and then start hooking off it it, following it with a right uppercut and then finishing with another hook. That'll be the key to putting Floyd on ***** street. The only punches that'll land cleanly will be the starting jab, and the ending hook, but those are the only punches that need to land, in my opinion.
Oscar would have to jab Floyd to death in order to win. His jab is solid enough that he can build the rest of whatever he is trying to do off of that. He should throw EVERYTHING behind a jab. Including the kitchen sink.
Until I looked at it again, after reading your last post on this one, it said the same thing as this one did.
By the way......A bit touchy, aren't ya? I didn't insinuate you were a moron, or had short-term memory problems, or anything at all, really. I just asked, quite simply, why there were two threads, because I thought I might've missed something.
In other words, don't be such a ****....it was just a question.
Comment