Frank Warren Takes Aim at Hopkins, Froch

[Allucard]

Joe from the block who some how remains undefeated...

Even though he is a "white boy"...

You must be joking. He was dropped by a 43 year old. On the race remark, you are right, neither Casamayor or Nate Campbell, who both defeated 10 years younger, undefeated champions got mentioned for anything regarding the millennium, or the p4p ratings. Joe beats a 43 year old after being dropped, by split decision and he's suddenly the fighter of the millennium. About him being undefeated, no biggie, travel to Europe some day to see all other Joes waiting in line, all undefeated, of course.

[Bobby Shaw]

You must be joking. He was dropped by a 43 year old. On the race remark, you are right, neither Casamayor or Nate Campbell, who both defeated 10 years younger, undefeated champions got mentioned for anything regarding the millennium, or the p4p ratings. Joe beats a 43 year old after being dropped, by split decision and he's suddenly the fighter of the millennium. About him being undefeated, no biggie, travel to Europe some day to see all other Joes waiting in line, all undefeated, of course.

You could not have put it any better.

I cant believe some people who cant qualify the zero on someone's record.

[th4l3pr3ch4un]

I guess clearly beating guys like kessler and hopkins one right after the other makes you an average fighter now a days...

[Kilrain]

HERE, HERE
[QUOTE=chiyoko;3419865]Warren is a crazy nut.He said joe is the fighter of the millenium.Fighting the Sakio Bika's and being knocked down by a 43yr old man dont make anyone a fighter of the millenium.
QUOTE]

[NeXt In Line]

Okay will people quit with the "Joe got a gift" bull****? I'm as big a Hopkins fan as you'll find on this forum, but just cause the fight was (somewhat) close doesn't mean Joe got a gift. CompuBox isn't how a fight is judged, so all this "CompuBox numbers suck for this fight!" doesn't mean ****.

Joe won. Give up.

[Chunk..]

Whats Carl Froch done wrong?

Frank Warren's a ****!

[abadger]

You must be joking. He was dropped by a 43 year old. On the race remark, you are right, neither Casamayor or Nate Campbell, who both defeated 10 years younger, undefeated champions got mentioned for anything regarding the millennium, or the p4p ratings. Joe beats a 43 year old after being dropped, by split decision and he's suddenly the fighter of the millennium. About him being undefeated, no biggie, travel to Europe some day to see all other Joes waiting in line, all undefeated, of course.

You already posted something similar in another thread, and I answered you there, but:

The reason Casamayor and Nate Campbell don't get the same credit as Calzaghe is because they weren't undefeated 10 year champs themselves, which Joe is. He isn't the fighter of the millenium but he was already p4p top 10 before he fought Hopkins. Hopkins himself was p4p top 10 too, so thats why Joe gets more credit than Casamayor and Campbell, and deservedly so.
________
Teen video

[Addison]

In his latest "Frankly Speaking" column, promoter Frank Warren took aim at Bernard Hopkins and unbeaten super middleweight Carl Froch over the recent comments they made about Joe Calzaghe. [details]

Warren is quite the den mother..

Froch is an honest man. Warren has got no class as usual.

[Jambo boy]

Warren is a **** sucker

[Addison]

Regarding what Warren said about Froch; this is alot of what I've seen here from a certain nationalist group.. Somebody says something OBJECTIVE about the issue - and it immediately gets turned into a personal attack/insult on the person speaking. Childish nonsense..