"Calzaghe Labels Hopkins a Sore Loser"

[MikeBrew328]

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=3368064

This was probably posted already, if not then just pay no mind.

But if I were Bernard Hopkins, I'd be mad too. CompuBox said he got hit 235 times. Look at his face after the face. Where's the evidence?? Even if he got hit by soft shots, getting hit 235 times would show evidence. Rounds where CompuBox said he got hit 20 times, I could make a case for 5 landed blows.

Whatever, this is like beating a dead horse

[hypeassasian]

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=3368064

This was probably posted already, if not then just pay no mind.

But if I were Bernard Hopkins, I'd be mad too. CompuBox said he got hit 235 times. Look at his face after the face. Where's the evidence?? Even if he got hit by soft shots, getting hit 235 times would show evidence. Rounds where CompuBox said he got hit 20 times, I could make a case for 5 landed blows.

Whatever, this is like beating a dead horse

Calzaghe knows he didn't do himself any favors with that slap happy performance. He would have been better off not fighting him. At least then his fans could say he would have dominated Hopkins. Fact is he struggled like hell with a 43 year old version of Hopkins that put him on his ass. Not a good measuring stick for him if you ask me......