More versatile fighter?

[Fox McCloud]

Which one had more angles to their game? Which one could adapt from style to style like it was nothing better?

God I love these two. That is why their trilogy had three fights that did not look a bit the same as the other two.

[Verstyle]

Marco can box and slug, BOTH GREAT. [B]THREAD CLOSED.[/

B]

[Fox McCloud]

Marco can box and slug, BOTH GREAT. [B]THREAD CLOSED.[/

B]

I think Morales can be put into that sentence in place of Marco. If you don't think Morales could box and slug great as well, you are nuts.

I think Morales was the better pure boxer than Barrera.

Barrera was the better brawler/slugger than Morales.

I do think that Barrera ended up being a better boxer than Morales ended up being as a slugger. That is, Barrera was better at learning the opposite style of the one that he started with.

It's close though.

[Verstyle]

I think Morales can be put into that sentence in place of Marco. If you don't think Morales could box and slug great as well, you are nuts.

I think Morales was the better pure boxer than Barrera.

Barrera was the better brawler/slugger than Morales.

I do think that Barrera ended up being a better boxer than Morales ended up being as a slugger. That is, Barrera was better at learning the opposite style of the one that he started with.

It's close though.

You're crazy....................

[wmute]

Barrera adapted better during fights IMO

[Fox McCloud]

You're crazy....................

Lol, which part? You don't think Morales could brawl? You might want to check out Morales/Pacquiao I again. He went all-out in that fight.