B-hop/Calzaghe winner based on style

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AintGottaClue
    What for that be
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 6204
    • 221
    • 92
    • 12,939

    #1

    B-hop/Calzaghe winner based on style

    Its pretty simple and i think after the heat and drama dies down more people will see it

    If your a fan of a come forward and punch agressive style, calzaghe won

    if your a fan of clean effective counter punchign and defence then B-hop won

    the fight was close and coulda gone either way and i beilve calzaghe got the descion is because the whole boxing world loves an agressive fighter, so unless your absolutly crush an oppenet with a style like hopkins you wont get the nod anywhere

    i still call for a rematch cause no man proved they were better
  • T-97
    BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 14808
    • 566
    • 628
    • 22,958

    #2
    Why, you wanna see Calzaghe

    [IMG]http://a669.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images01/90/l_a051cc4d7542d9162525125bc7041f4c.gif[/IMG]

    Him again?

    Joe took his best early, came back, beat him, ****d him. and won like he deserved to.

    Comment

    • AintGottaClue
      What for that be
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2004
      • 6204
      • 221
      • 92
      • 12,939

      #3
      class-less thing to do by calzaghe u brits should be ashamed

      Comment

      • Duggie
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 3917
        • 360
        • 39
        • 18,975

        #4
        why? Hopkins is a classless thug he deserved it, he's probably watching it now wanking himself silly memorising about the good old days in the prison showers

        Comment

        • GTL
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 3671
          • 140
          • 289
          • 10,439

          #5
          Originally posted by SturmRules
          Its pretty simple and i think after the heat and drama dies down more people will see it

          If your a fan of a come forward and punch agressive style, calzaghe won

          if your a fan of clean effective counter punchign and defence then B-hop won

          the fight was close and coulda gone either way and i beilve calzaghe got the descion is because the whole boxing world loves an agressive fighter, so unless your absolutly crush an oppenet with a style like hopkins you wont get the nod anywhere

          i still call for a rematch cause no man proved they were better
          doode, i havent seen you post here in forever.. nice to see you here again..

          i agree with the points

          Comment

          • DuttyBadBoyx
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 267
            • 39
            • 56
            • 6,317

            #6
            Just watched it again and Calzaghe won man lol
            The rest are just being biased cuz they dont wanna admit
            that a BRIT won..Not all im saying just a majority



            still call for a rematch cause no man proved they were better
            Joe was asked that and replied
            "Will Hopkins bring some fans next time" lol

            Rematch proves nothing Joe won end of..
            Theres thousand of other fights in history that deserved
            rematches also and never got them..
            This is no different MOVE ON
            Last edited by DuttyBadBoyx; 04-21-2008, 09:46 PM.

            Comment

            • pesticid
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 7236
              • 456
              • 500
              • 20,597

              #7
              Originally posted by SturmRules
              Its pretty simple and i think after the heat and drama dies down more people will see it

              If your a fan of a come forward and punch agressive style, calzaghe won

              if your a fan of clean effective counter punchign and defence then B-hop won

              the fight was close and coulda gone either way and i beilve calzaghe got the descion is because the whole boxing world loves an agressive fighter, so unless your absolutly crush an oppenet with a style like hopkins you wont get the nod anywhere

              i still call for a rematch cause no man proved they were better
              If by defense you mean clinching and running, and by clean effective counter punching you mean one shot a round followed by a headbut then I guess Bhop should've won.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43683
                • 4,650
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #8
                clean punching counts for more than the other three since in boxing, the clean punch is the only weapon against an opponent. The other three criteria are used when necessary to score a close round.

                if your a fan of the boxing rules hopkins prob won.

                if your a fan of your own rules calz prob won.

                Comment

                • pesticid
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 7236
                  • 456
                  • 500
                  • 20,597

                  #9
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  clean punching counts for more than the other three since in boxing, the clean punch is the only weapon against an opponent. The other three criteria are used when necessary to score a close round.

                  if your a fan of the boxing rules hopkins prob won.

                  if your a fan of your own rules calz prob won.
                  Hopkins does not follow boxing rules. He headbuts and grapples, fakes low blows and avoids contact as much as possible. His move would be illegal even in an mma fight.

                  Comment

                  • AintGottaClue
                    What for that be
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 6204
                    • 221
                    • 92
                    • 12,939

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Queensdawg
                    doode, i havent seen you post here in forever.. nice to see you here again..

                    i agree with the points
                    i have been here ive been posting under the name Pacrules for a long time cause i lost a bet when sturm got KOd by castelljo i just changed it back recently


                    if you say hopkins ran you should be dismissed as a boxing fan, THAT was not running by any means, that was movment to bring joe in and if you cant seperate the two i question your knowledge or maybe your heavily biased

                    the fight coulda gone either way just to re-iterate myself and it seems u touchy joe fans get ticked off and attack anyone who doesnt think it was a blowout for Joe

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP