Put Your Eternal Soul On It
Collapse
-
-
That's what tends to happen when you have a certain ratio of people on either side to start out. Hopkins has about two fans and virtually nobody bet on him to win comparitively speaking. That's how you know you're dealing with a full blown legitimate farce.Comment
-
Oh, and about 5 of these votes are two people who already voted.
Mickey already said he couldn't pick a winner.
That drops the numbers, but it doesn't matter. This is about who is dead ****ing serious about their position, and it's plain as day that there are very few of us, and a whole lot of people talking out of the sides of their necks.Comment
-
Calzaghe won by two rounds.
Hopkins was stuck to him like chewing gum for the last two rounds that proved decisive.
Previously he pulled the ***** move, Hopkins ran out of gas. Then just tried to make the most disgraceful spectacle he could and then say he took the guy to school. Okay mate.
Okay Hopkins... I'm sure their lining up round the block to fight this tosser now. He's harming his legacy.Comment
-
Heres an objective opinion. I'm a Brit, a Calzaghe fan who bet money that Hopkins would win on points. I like them both and am not biased either way....my bet was only based on the fact that I thought in a close fight Hopkins would get the nod.
On a round by round basis I had Hopkins at least a round ahead up till after round ten. I gave Calzaghe the last two rounds making him a narrow points winner.
BUT.......I felt the rounds Hopkins won were far superior to the rounds Calzaghe shaded. I also felt Hopkins was much stronger and had greater punch power. I didn't feel Calzaghe won any rounds big.
I also felt Hopkins whining didn't go down too well, the low blows were innocuous looking affairs.
I felt under the present scoring system the right man won but feel Hopkins produced the more eyecatching work, just not consistently enough after round six.Comment
-
Good post. And your vote is respected.Heres an objective opinion. I'm a Brit, a Calzaghe fan who bet money that Hopkins would win on points. I like them both and am not biased either way....my bet was only based on the fact that I thought in a close fight Hopkins would get the nod.
On a round by round basis I had Hopkins at least a round ahead up till after round ten. I gave Calzaghe the last two rounds making him a narrow points winner.
BUT.......I felt the rounds Hopkins won were far superior to the rounds Calzaghe shaded. I also felt Hopkins was much stronger and had greater punch power. I didn't feel Calzaghe won any rounds big.
I also felt Hopkins whining didn't go down too well, the low blows were innocuous looking affairs.
I felt under the present scoring system the right man won but feel Hopkins produced the more eyecatching work, just not consistently enough after round six.
Not just a talker, I admire that.
Comment
-
I didn't see a single round that you HAD to give Hopkins. There were about six you had to give to Calzaghe.
Some of you are just bitter and so giving every even round to Hopkins. It has to be something to do with deeply ingrained stereotypes resisting what your eyes see.Comment
Yeah, that's about what I expect. Lots of bold talk. No votes though.
Comment