Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Andre Berto beating a 43 year old Mayweather impressive???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Dye View Post
    If i had a Penny for Every Time I masterbated I'd Be a Billionaire.
    Same here.

    The reason Berto over 43 year old Mayweather is not nearly as impressive as Calzaghe over 43 year old Hopkins is this:

    Mayweather is a reflexes fighter. You can't tell me that you think his level of technique (which really isn't even ATG stuff) is going to keep him undefeated. When those reflexes go, he is going to have a similar downhill freefall that Roy Jones did before he switched his style up to a Winky Wright-type style. Jones doesn't even look all that great (once again not ATG stuff) when he uses the Wright style, but it has him beating people who are lower on the totem pole.

    Hopkins on the other hand does not need to be young to do what he does. He avoids punishment, and throws the counter straight right hand beautifully. Him being 43 years old really only hurt him in that he wasn't super active, but by the end of the fight, his money punch (the straight right) wasn't landing almost at all. I don't think a younger Hopkins would have done any better against Calzaghe if he makes the same adjustment he did midway through the fight.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by azza View Post
      Who the **** would name a black man paul?
      You must spread reputation around before giving it Azza again.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
        Wouldn't Berto have to be in his mid 30's to beat a 43 y/o Mayweather? What a bizzare poll.
        I agree, this is a very bizarre poll, but it dosen't surprise me because Burner is a very bizarre dumb poster that makes a living owning himself on Boxingscene.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
          I agree, this is a very bizarre poll, but it dosen't surprise me because Burner is a very bizarre dumb poster that makes a living owning himself on Boxingscene.
          You get what the **** this thread is about dont act brand new.

          Comment


          • #15
            ******ed thread.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Burner View Post
              You get what the **** this thread is about dont act brand new.
              Your thread is dumb.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by TommyGunn. View Post
                Your thread is dumb.
                You just said that...are you ******ed or some ****...you literally posted the same shyt twice.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Burner View Post
                  You just said that...are you ******ed or some ****...you literally posted the same shyt twice.
                  I actually made a post regarding the topic, are we going to have a discussion about it or are you just going to keep diming on people who said that your thread sucks?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                    I actually made a post regarding the topic, are we going to have a discussion about it or are you just going to keep diming on people who said that your thread sucks?
                    Point blank...........

                    If you beat a fighter who is 43 it is not a great win..no matter who it is.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      if i had a dime for everytime somebody said "if i had a dime for everytime"i'd have a lot of dimes.
                      Last edited by AntonTheMeh; 04-20-2008, 11:46 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP