Should there be a Calzaghe-Hopkins II rematch?

**GodOfWar** · 04-20-2008, 10:04 AM

I think no because Calzaghe won in America, plus this fight was ****ing horrible with Hopkins clinching the majority of the time. I rather watch an exciting fight like Calzaghe/Pavlik, I really hope Pavlik camp has balls because that would be a very entertaining fight.

**Kobe Bryant** · 04-20-2008, 10:08 AM

No there styles do not mesh well at all. Hopkins is too physical for Cal. And with this it is hard for Cal to look fluid. Last night Joe was not accurate or fluid.

And it just wasn't entertaining. Hopkins held but Joe held as well just not as much. Joe should fight someone who is gonna be a more exciting fight. Anyone other than Hopkins. Maybe Kelly, Dawson, or Roy. Either 3 would produce an exciting fight.

**Feint** · 04-20-2008, 10:10 AM

No. There would be no point. I don't realistically see an even older Hopkins doing anything more than what he did last night.

**Silencers** · 04-20-2008, 10:10 AM

No point. Calzaghe won clearly IMO and the fight wasn't very entertaining.

**thegreatone1** · 04-20-2008, 10:11 AM

Wasnt close enough.

**Kobe Bryant** · 04-20-2008, 10:13 AM

Originally posted by Orisha

IMO he should face jones.
kelly comes up in the inside, and thats what calzaghe is good for, he destroys boxers who go inside.

i believe jones is the great opponent for joe.

Joe wouldn't destroy Kelly by any means. No way in my opinion. It would be hard for him in this fight. Kelly has just as good a work rate. He is by no means gun shy. And works exclusivley behind the jab to set up Joe's weakness (the right hand).

Should there be a Calzaghe-Hopkins II rematch?