Do you AGREE with ESPN? they put CALZAGHE at the 2 spot...p4p list.

**Miburo** · 04-20-2008, 01:48 AM

Originally posted by Domain

Floyd jr is still number 1
Calzaghe replaced Pacquiao

what do you guys think?

It shows that fans and analysts alike care more about the number in the wins column than how a fighter looks in the ring (not that Pac looked spectacular in his last outing, I had JMM winning).

**My Name Is...** · 04-20-2008, 01:49 AM

no and espn had B Hop winning. **** JOE!!!!

**supermandathoe** · 04-20-2008, 01:51 AM

Pac beat a higher ranked fighter than Calzaghe did, hmmmm. On a side not I put Cal at number 2 just based on his skills in the ring alone.

**Addison** · 04-20-2008, 01:52 AM

Obviously they're basing this on the generic, written down on a piece of paper, fact that Calzaghe beat Hopkins. To be fair; I guess they think Calzaghe could defeat almost anyone in Boxing the way he fights. I have to disagree. Hopkins was the very first upper tier fighter Calzaghe ever faced, and Bernard is a geezer who got winded late, and was innactive throughout.

**j.razor** · 04-20-2008, 02:04 AM

b-hop

Originally posted by Domain

Floyd jr is still number 1
Calzaghe replaced Pacquiao

what do you guys think?

hell no, cal. did not beat B-Hop!!

**Killa Cam** · 04-20-2008, 02:08 AM

like i said b4, calzagkhe is still in tha same place in my p4p rankins...not top 3.

**The Hammer** · 04-20-2008, 02:24 AM

Originally posted by Killa Cam

like i said b4, calzagkhe is still in tha same place in my p4p rankins...not top 3.

What do you have against Joe Calzaghe?

**hayZ** · 04-20-2008, 02:43 AM

i love joe as a fighter but he shouldnt be 2nd above pac.

3rd/4th

**Killa Cam** · 04-20-2008, 02:49 AM

Originally posted by Tunney

What do you have against Joe Calzaghe?

nothing. let me explain.
1. pbf
2. pacman
3. cotto(even tho hes a lowblowin peice of ****)
not in my top 3, like i said.

Do you AGREE with ESPN? they put CALZAGHE at the 2 spot...p4p list.