Bernard Hopkins proved tonight that if he would have fought Calzaghe 7 or 8 year ago he would have destroyed Calzaghe in a fight. At 43 year of age Bernard still fought a well a fight he could have. Calzaghe landed mostly slapping punches that really didn't hit the mark. Hopkins was able to bait Calzaghe in, he (HOPKINS) just didnt have the energy even in the middle of the fight to capitalize more better on Calzaghe flaws. This give testimony that even in a very close lost Hopkins still wins against one of the so called best pound 4 pound fighters in the world. Calzaghe didn't really prove anything in this fight, he still needs to fight 3 more american fighters to be legit. Hopkins is merely a shell of his former self and still can hang with the supposedly the best there is. BOW DOWN TO ONE OF THE BEST FIGHTERS OF OUR TIME. WE ARE NEVER GOING TO SEE ANOTHER FIGHTER WHO WILL GET IN THE RING WITH ANYONE, AND TALK THE TALK AND WALK THE WALK. Calzaghe is a good fighter, he has waited 10 years too late to come to America to fight. But all go well with him though (CALZAGHE).
Bernard Hopkins proved tonight that if he would have fought Calzaghe 7 or 8 year ago he would have destroyed Calzaghe in a fight. .
Yeah right, thats why he acted like a little ***** when one of calzaghes slaps made hopkins crap him self. Hell, he said he was hit hard in the cup when he clearly was nipped and not even hit hard at all down there. Hopkins is a disgrace and kept trying to cheat
Calzaghe is way more past prime than Hopkins. He lost every real exchange against Kessler and today against Hopkins. That would not happen 6-7 years ago. I think the Lacy-fight was his last prime-peformance.
Come on, boxchmpn. You don't think being 7 years younger would have helped Calzaghe as well? And 3 more American fighters to be legit? Isn't that kind of arbitrary? Why does anyone have to beat any American fighters to be legit? I thought the way to judge a fighter is if they beat good fighters, regardless of their nationality.
Comment