Before this fight I honestly, even after watching many of his fights, could not understand why anyone thought that Bernard Hopkins could win. Like many here I thought Joe Calzghe would have too much for him and basically control the fight, box at range and get a wide UD.
How wrong I was. Without doubt, that was Bernard's fight. I don't mean he won, he was too negative for that, but he imposed his will on the way the fight was fought like no boxer I have seen before. I now understand completely why many thought he would win, he is an absolutely nightmarish opponent, and suddenly all those comments about him taking Calzaghe to a dark place make a lot of sense.
At times I was squinting at the screen wondering what on earth had happened to Joe, wondering where the dynamic, dominant fighter I had seen so many times before had gone.
Overall, i think the Calzaghe win was the fair result, as someone else here posted already, it is a victory for the agressive fighter and shows that you cannot expect to win merely by being defensive and neutralising the other fighter's game plan. To win a fight, you should have to win.
Of the two men, obviously, I would be proudest if I was Joe, because he has just won and done what a lot of people said he couldn't, but if I were Bernard Hopkins I would be proud too. He was the one who was able to do exactly what he said he would do from the beginning, whereas Joe got nowhere near executing the fight he had predicted. Its just that what Bernard set out to do was not enough to win the fight. I would hate to risk calzaghe fighting him again.
Absolute respect to Bernard Hopkins.
________
Fetish Smoking
How wrong I was. Without doubt, that was Bernard's fight. I don't mean he won, he was too negative for that, but he imposed his will on the way the fight was fought like no boxer I have seen before. I now understand completely why many thought he would win, he is an absolutely nightmarish opponent, and suddenly all those comments about him taking Calzaghe to a dark place make a lot of sense.
At times I was squinting at the screen wondering what on earth had happened to Joe, wondering where the dynamic, dominant fighter I had seen so many times before had gone.
Overall, i think the Calzaghe win was the fair result, as someone else here posted already, it is a victory for the agressive fighter and shows that you cannot expect to win merely by being defensive and neutralising the other fighter's game plan. To win a fight, you should have to win.
Of the two men, obviously, I would be proudest if I was Joe, because he has just won and done what a lot of people said he couldn't, but if I were Bernard Hopkins I would be proud too. He was the one who was able to do exactly what he said he would do from the beginning, whereas Joe got nowhere near executing the fight he had predicted. Its just that what Bernard set out to do was not enough to win the fight. I would hate to risk calzaghe fighting him again.
Absolute respect to Bernard Hopkins.
________
Fetish Smoking
Comment