Calzaghe announces his key to victory.

[dansweeney]

Lets get real here Joes resume is not as good as Hopkins after the fight should Calzaghe win it will be imo but Tito would get hurt against Eubank who was a huge Middleweight.

What have Tito or Wright done at 160lbs or above to suggest they would beat a great fighter like Chris Eubank who was proven at 160 and 168.

lets cool down on eubank here ok. he wasnt a world beater jesus. winky would at 160 would beat eubank. eubank was a big middleweight without a big punch. tito has been stopped once, by hopkins. so eubank doesnt stop him.

[dansweeney]

Maybe I was the only person in the world that knew Hopkins would thrash those guys? Cool.

lol your an idiot!!! you probably didn't know who bernard was before that fight. lol. ya you knew buddy. easy to say seven years later. hahahahaha.. what a joke.

[dansweeney]

Lacy was the big favourite against Calzaghe aswell, but people still write that win off as nothing. In hindsight we can all see that Trinidad had no business at middleweight, he was out of his depth. Kessler didn't have a who's who resume, but who is to say he won't in the future? I could see him beating the likes of Dawson, Pavlik, and Taylor.

In my opinion both Calzaghe and Hopkins are great men and great champions, but you can't slag ones record off without slagging off the others.

lacy was 2-1 not that big of a favorite, and don't compare lacy to tito. look at tito's resume. its pretty good. kessler got his heart taken dude., he is done. ill give joe that. the truth is if hopkins was 33 instead of 43 this isn't even a fight and everybody knows that. the only thing making it close is the age factor for bernard

[Jolly Roger]

lets cool down on eubank here ok. he wasnt a world beater jesus. winky would at 160 would beat eubank. eubank was a big middleweight without a big punch. tito has been stopped once, by hopkins. so eubank doesnt stop him.

Eubank was without a big punch? I disagree. He merely held back after the Watson II fight.

[Jolly Roger]

lacy was 2-1 not that big of a favorite, and don't compare lacy to tito. look at tito's resume. its pretty good. kessler got his heart taken dude., he is done. ill give joe that. the truth is if hopkins was 33 instead of 43 this isn't even a fight and everybody knows that. the only thing making it close is the age factor for bernard

I agree Lacy shouldn't be compared to a welterweight, and to say Kessler is done is ridiculous.

[dansweeney]

I agree Lacy shouldn't be compared to a welterweight, and to say Kessler is done is ridiculous.

lol watson was whooping eubanks ass too. you just said he held back after that fight. kessler is mental., he bitched out of a fight with miranda, that's all you need to know about him. if you really want to get all technical about the weights then bernard is a natural middle weight and joe is picking on somebody smaller than he is since joe has always been a super middle. so by your logic even if joe wins it must be discounted because clearly hopkins was out of his depth at light heavy or even super middle. lol rebut that chief.....................

[Jolly Roger]

lol watson was whooping eubanks ass too. you just said he held back after that fight. kessler is mental., he bitched out of a fight with miranda, that's all you need to know about him. if you really want to get all technical about the weights then bernard is a natural middle weight and joe is picking on somebody smaller than he is since joe has always been a super middle. so by your logic even if joe wins it must be discounted because clearly hopkins was out of his depth at light heavy or even super middle. lol rebut that chief.....................

I don't know Kesslers reasons for not fighting Miranda, and neither do you. You're obviously on the wind up so i'll not waste any more time.

[ExecutiveOutlaw]

lmaooooooooooo

[dansweeney]

I don't know Kesslers reasons for not fighting Miranda, and neither do you. You're obviously on the wind up so i'll not waste any more time.

lol. that's what happens when your own point gets used against you. its called the art of verbal pugilism. so hopkins being the smaller man for most of his career isnt relevant here because your a calzaghe fan and you only came here to discredit bernards resume is that what your saying? but its ok to say tito was undersized but not ok to say the same about bernard when it comes to this fight against a guy who fought his whole career a division above bernard?

[Jolly Roger]

lol. that's what happens when your own point gets used against you. its called the art of verbal pugilism. so hopkins being the smaller man for most of his career isnt relevant here because your a calzaghe fan and you only came here to discredit bernards resume is that what your saying? but its ok to say tito was undersized but not ok to say the same about bernard when it comes to this fight against a guy who fought his whole career a division above bernard?

I don't see Bernard as a natural middle these days, and he was always a big middleweight anyways. The difference between supermiddle and middle isn't anywhere near the same as welter and middle. I haven't tried to discredit Bernard, in this thread i've called him a great champion and a great man, but that any criticisms of Calzaghes record can also be aimed at Bernard's. Just read the thread, it's all there.

"art of verbal pugilism"? Where is the art in picking up a debate halfway through and making yourself look an idiot.

Also not once have i said i'm a Calzaghe fan.