dam good post. agree with your assumptions.
Reality thread here "Bhop vs Calzaghe" No delusional post!!!
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Exactly. Winky had a higher work rate against Hopkins then Taylor did...Bernard was just to inactive in the early rounds. Speed throws him off, but not high workrates.
Which is even suspect in the first place. Tarver had to lose fat for Hopkins and he had like 8 weeks to do so. I think it's more of an excuse then anything, just like how tarver's "steaks were poisoned"that is Antonios fault if he had trouble making weight
It's not even really sure if Tarver was really 200 plus pounds anyway. There's a pic of him looking kinda fat during the "weigh in" during Rocky 6, but we don't know how much he weighed and he could have easily lost that during camp.Comment
-
I agree with this post.
Why can't everyone be so civil? You got Bhopreign going on about how Calzaghe has never fought anyone and Hopkins is going to destroy him and then you got xfiles ****ting all over Calzaghe not giving him an ounce of credit at all.
It's a close fight to call, get over it.Comment
-
Here i can see what you mean.
My head says calzaghe has too much output for hopkins,
but i have a feeling says calzaghe doesnt understand what he is facing, hopkins its so boxing clever its unreal, he tends to find a way to neturalise a fighters strengths, and impose his own strengths on them.
If it goes into a boxing chess match, im gonna go with hopkins.
If the fight is at pace and more instinctive, it should be calzaghe.Last edited by Technical_Skill; 04-13-2008, 05:35 PM.Comment
-
Why do people think that Calzaghe is going to fight Hopkins like Jirov fought Toney?
Calzaghe has never stood straight in front of any of his opponents and just winged punches non-stop leaving himself open to be countered all night like Jirov did.
Joe is going to come in at many different angles and also punch from them, while continuously moving like he always does.
Also people saying Hatton and Woods losses having an effect on the Calzaghe/Hopkins outcome is ridiculous. Those losses will have as much effect as Lacy's loss to Joe, none!
Calzaghe is going to win and you can take that to the bank.Comment
-
Where did I say Calzaghe never fought anyone? Hate when people say things that dont exist.I agree with this post.
Why can't everyone be so civil? You got Bhopreign going on about how Calzaghe has never fought anyone and Hopkins is going to destroy him and then you got xfiles ****ting all over Calzaghe not giving him an ounce of credit at all.
It's a close fight to call, get over it.Comment
-
Tito was too small, though. Look at him! A fighter who's pretty much useless over 154. No way was he ever gonna beat Hopkins.
You really think Calzaghe is gonna come out swinging like a moron?
He won't, I guarantee it. He will choose his shots more carefully, box with precision and great movement.
Last edited by FRKO; 04-13-2008, 05:49 PM.Comment
-
Here's the problem, he comes in unbalanced because he jumps in and out firing multiple shots. When he comes in he doesnt do a great job of protecting himself either, he relies alot on reflexes. He is one fighter that i think is very susceptible to being 'timed out'. Timing beats speed if used correctly. (Like quintana timed out a high output paul williams with the left hand)
I hope calzaghe understand hopkins is very good at reading anything incoming from long or short distance, i think he'll look to parry calzaghe and inject with clinches, right hands and body shots whenever calzaghe tries to get off combinations.
I think it could turn into a chess match if and when calzaghe realises he cant hit bernard like the others and begins to out-think himself. Thats one way i see him losing the fight.Comment
Comment