Great Britain vs USA the facts.
Collapse
-
-
Well if Haye does beat either of the Klitchsko's; and Froch someones manages to grab the WBA belt as well holding onto the WBC belt (lol) during the Super Six; and Khan fights Timo...
Nah, I'm getting too far ahead of myself.Comment
-
Comment
-
A lot has to do with training and opportunities.
The US has far better Gyms and trainers.
The US has a better history of boxing and maybe more poverty and ******'s.Comment
-
Comment
-
You guys are re**** if all you are going to debate is title holders. What about all the world class fighters America has but they don't have titles because other Americas have the belt. Look up and down 175, 147, or 140 there are guys that would be on top but they can't break through because it's controlled by Dawson, Mayweather/Shane, or Bradley. Secondly, the whole population debate is garbage in my book. Just because you have a high population does not mean you are going to have elite boxers(china v japan for instance). The best way to compare is head to head and when you have a world class fighter from the UK he usually loses to a world class fighter from America. I don't mean to offend my U.K. fans but facts are facts, you just can't compare the two nations.Comment

Comment