How was the Tarver/Woods fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Degsy
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 918
    • 76
    • 121
    • 7,069

    #21
    Originally posted by sparked_85
    yeah it would seem American judges have completely different ideals.

    Woods got completely ****d.

    I had it 12 rounds to zip! Woods at best won round 3.

    Good news for Joe Calzaghe who will be the guy making the fight against 'Nard.

    I laughed when Woodhall gave Woods some random round after about two minutes of deliberation 'yeah, I'm going to give that round to Clinton'

    'So he needs to win all the remaining 5 rounds to get a draw Richie'

    'Looks that way'

    Woods let himself down a little I think. Shame.

    They must be awarding points on the basis of being the aggressor, but my definition of an aggressor doesn't include someone going forward getting hit 3 times for every punch they offload

    Comment

    • Mozza
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2006
      • 3802
      • 233
      • 174
      • 12,277

      #22
      I wouldn't bother. One of the worst fights I have ever seen.

      Comment

      • sparked_85
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 6036
        • 158
        • 97
        • 12,597

        #23
        Originally posted by Degsy
        They must be awarding points on the basis of being the aggressor, but my definition of an aggressor doesn't include someone going forward getting hit 3 times for every punch they offload
        Definetely. He was getting outscored.

        He let Tarver off the ropes far too easily as well. Woods lacked desire, belief and mental toughness.

        He could have made that a fight. Tarver is not that great.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP