Fraud Gayweather - Shook With Good Reason...

[Sin City]

So Cotto won in such a way against Mosley right?...the last two rounds, he "ran and never engaged again"...is that vaild to say????

No he didn't because he fought every round leading to those last two final rounds.
If Mayweather took two rounds of I would have no problem but he does it from the beginning of the fight.
This is the reason I am not a fan... He just isn't pleasing to watch.
You may like him.. that's cool but I am not about to spend my money on one of his lame PPVs.

[THE REED]

If you win the fight.. its the other persons fault...

POINT BLANK PERIOD.


IF you win by potshotting... Its the other persons fault for letting them.

IF you run to a victory.... Its the other persons fault for not cutting off the ring properly.

If you back peddle all night to a victory... Its the other persons fault for not moving forward fast enough.

There are no excuses... Its more of a ***** move to let someone pot shot you for 12 rounds, than the pot shotter himself.

If something works, Dont change it.

No excuses, your job is to win.

[COACH WEBB]

No he didn't because he fought every round leading to those last two final rounds.
If Mayweather took two rounds of I would have no problem but he does it from the beginning of the fight.
This is the reason I am not a fan... He just isn't pleasing to watch.
You may like him.. that's cool but I am not about to spend my money on one of his lame PPVs.

Ok. I sat back and watched you post and used your post to test it against your "fav" fighter, Cotto. There is an old saying, "what is good for the goose is good for the gander". Meaning if one can do it and its fine, y can't another?

If you say that a person (May) is a coward (u used the b the word, i dont use that language) for "running" and not fighting, then use it the SAME way for Miguel Cotto! He fought Mosley and had a lead, i'll admit that. Did he secure his lead by fighting the WHOLE 12 ROUNDS or running like a "coward"? The last two rounds Cotto was ALL OVER THE RING.

What I am sayingis if its a problem for Mayweather to do certain things, the same goes for Cotto and EVERY OTHER BOXER!

Plain and basic common sense...YA DIIIGGG?!?!

[COACH WEBB]

If you win the fight.. its the other persons fault...

POINT BLANK PERIOD.


IF you win by potshotting... Its the other persons fault for letting them.

IF you run to a victory.... Its the other persons fault for not cutting off the ring properly.

If you back peddle all night to a victory... Its the other persons fault for not moving forward fast enough.

There are no excuses... Its more of a ***** move to let someone pot shot you for 12 rounds, than the pot shotter himself.

If something works, Dont change it.

No excuses, your job is to win.

That goes for ANY FIGHTER...YA DIIIGGG?!?!?!

[COACH WEBB]

LOL....How can u run from someone, yet outpunch and outland on them? As for Tito/Oscar.....Oscar won that fight regardless of the fact that he literally RAN the last 3 rounds.

If that is the case, mayweather does that to EVERYONE!...How is that running? I mean you guys make all these threads and posts about Mayweather about how "scared" he is of Cotto. How he runs in his fights. how is not entertaining. But use those same views with Cotto and EVERY OTHER FIGTHER.

Cotto had a lead in his fight with Mosley and what did he do the last two rounds. The way yall see it "he was smart and did enough to win." But if that was Floyd, "he is a coward, he is scared..." We would hear a million things.
But its fine for Cotto to "run" the last two rounds and only win by 2 points???

We need to be real NSB!

C'mon....YA DIIIGGG!!!???

[THE REED]

If you win the fight.. its the other persons fault...

POINT BLANK PERIOD.


IF you win by potshotting... Its the other persons fault for letting them.

IF you run to a victory.... Its the other persons fault for not cutting off the ring properly.

If you back peddle all night to a victory... Its the other persons fault for not moving forward fast enough.

There are no excuses... Its more of a ***** move to let someone pot shot you for 12 rounds, than the pot shotter himself.

If something works, Dont change it.

No excuses, your job is to win.

Wheres the response to this?

[pbftxrs316]

i'll respond to it, those little ******* don't have a comeback. kind of reminds me of when i post, they really lose all credibility to respond back with something even remotely valid.

point, blank, period. floyd beats cotto, he is too good for cotto. i have broke this fight down so many times, and i don't have to do it again, but if deevel or evil genius(wow, i'm starting to think they are the same person), or whoever wants to challenge me on it, i'll be happy to respond with a long ass post, because you know i will.

like i've noted before, floyd bashers are hypocrites, and they contradict themselves more than john kerry, and it's not even funny. but, they can make their insults, and none of it means anything when they can't back it up with logical opinions.

and by the way, there was a thread made about floyd claiming he's the best, because he fought the best, and many bashers of floyd claimed they don't don't at his older fights to call him the best, they look at what he's done recently, and i read those posts and laughed because they only further enhanced my point of calling them hypocrites, because if you don't look at his past fights, how can you call him what you dumb ****s call him. his foundation to his legacy lies in his past fights as well as his recent fights dumb asses.

it's funny, they don't look at his past fights when it comes to saying something positive about him, but they'll damn sure bring up the castillo fight when he was at 135, in i believe, was it 2002? i call these people contradictors.

money may, i salute you brother for not using foul language to get your points across, but i'll do it for you homey. you make fair and logical posts just like i do and others like reed does, even though me and him disagree on floyd and roy, but that's fine.

[COACH WEBB]

Wheres the response to this?

REED...how cud one respond.. what you said is real. It isn't opinion. Its like getting mad at Jordan for only shooting 15-19 footers instead of dunking to win. The last time I heard, a win is WIN....but am I waiting patiently for the responses though..REAL TALK.

[DrewWoodside]

If you win the fight.. its the other persons fault...

POINT BLANK PERIOD.


IF you win by potshotting... Its the other persons fault for letting them.

IF you run to a victory.... Its the other persons fault for not cutting off the ring properly.

If you back peddle all night to a victory... Its the other persons fault for not moving forward fast enough.

There are no excuses... Its more of a ***** move to let someone pot shot you for 12 rounds, than the pot shotter himself.

If something works, Dont change it.

No excuses, your job is to win.

I completely agree with this, But I must admit that I will never back a bike rider.

[COACH WEBB]

i'll respond to it, those little ******* don't have a comeback. kind of reminds me of whe i post, they really lose all credibility to respond back with something even remotely valid.

point, blank, period. floyd beats cotto, he is too good for cotto. i have broke this fight down so many times, and i don't have to do it again, but if deevel or eveil genius(wow, i'm starting to think they are the same person), or whoever wants to challenge me on it, i'll be happy to respond with a long ass post, because you know i will.

like i've noted before, floyd bashers are hypocrites, and they contradict themselves more than john kerry, and it's not even funny. but, they can make their insults, but none of it means anything when they can't back it up with logical opinions.

your post brings a song to my head, although I don't listen to rap music anymore. You remember Lil Kim's joint..its goes like " I know you hear me on the radio?" then it says, "TRUE!"...lol

what you said is "TRUE!!!"...LOL..YA DIIIGGG!?!?