David Haye vs. Sam Peter

[Dynamite Kid]

i would love to have seen Bruno v Peter there would have been some rabbit punches in that fight

[rusticraver]

Peter wouldnt be able to land a decent shot on him once, he's too slow and Haye's reflexes are too good. He gets beat bad in this fight

[hookoutofhell]

at the minute it wouldbe peter but thats more down to haye bein an unknown at heavyweight.

personally i think that with a couple of fights at heavy weight haye would be ready to take on and beat peter.

it would depend on whether or not he could whether the early storm - peter has alot of stamina problems and you can see haye winning the latter rounds comfortably or maybe even scoring a KO after round 9.
________
SUZUKI ESCUDO

[Randall_Hopkirk]

Haye by decision. He could use his superior speed and agility to get in and out. His power would be a factor but I doubt he could stop Peter, Sam seems to take straight pucnhes rather well and although Haye can mix it up, he won't finish a top HW with a hook or uppercut. His money punch, the straight right, didn't get Klitschko very far in terms of stopping Peter. Neither guy has a good jab.

Of course Peter is strong as an ox and could soak up the pressure and overwhelm Haye to knock him out.

[sparked_85]

Haye's punches would get there again and again and again. Peter is so slow it's spiritual.

A punchers chance is not enough for me to pick Peter. I think he'd get smacked around something chronic. Obviously he has big chance to KO David though.

I'd be more confident after seeing Haye against big guy.

Right now I'd favour Haye, he is much better than Peter.

[P4P Opinion]

Haye by UD or late KO/TKO.

Peter is a complete joke. He's slow, technically unsound and far too fat. He always has a punchers chance against Haye, but I feel betting on him would be a travesty. I'm not saying Haye is brilliant, far from it, just that Peter is fairly **** and the fact he owns a title is evidence of how **** the heavyweight division is.