Hatton a bum??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ATFsven
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 710
    • 20
    • 1
    • 7,083

    #1

    Hatton a bum??

    i get the impression most posters think that Hatton is a bum with his loss to Mayweather.

    SO who would win at 140 between Hatton and Cotto??
    48
    Cotto
    56.25%
    27
    Hatton
    43.75%
    21
  • RichCCFC
    46-0
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 12846
    • 440
    • 132
    • 22,116

    #2
    140 - Hatton
    147 - Cotto

    Cotto didn't seem to have much of a chin when he had to weight drain himself and his jab was never as good at that weight.

    Comment

    • sparked_85
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 6036
      • 158
      • 97
      • 12,597

      #3
      If Warren was Hattons manager you can beat your arse he would have had Cotto at 140.

      Comment

      • KESSLER
        GOONER FOR LIFE
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 15487
        • 782
        • 716
        • 24,000

        #4
        Nah, Hatton is not a bum.

        He fought the best fighter in the world, he came up short .. Plus he fought outta his weightclass.

        140, I dunno. This would be a fight with alot of body work, they both got average chins. I think Hatton COULD pull it off, but I don't know.. I'm leaning towards Cotto, but Hatton was more natural at 140 than Cotto.

        Comment

        • MANGLER
          Sex Tape Flop Artist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 30142
          • 1,705
          • 2,355
          • 46,598

          #5
          Originally posted by _Ricky_
          140 - Hatton
          147 - Cotto

          Cotto didn't seem to have much of a chin when he had to weight drain himself and his jab was never as good at that weight.
          Co-sign. Cotto would **** him up now but Hatton's stamina and workrate were strong as hell at 140 and Cotto was more vulnerable chin-wise and conditioning-wise. Superlightweight is a Hatton decision, Welterweight is a Cotto stoppage.

          Comment

          • BennyST
            Shhhh...
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 9263
            • 1,036
            • 500
            • 21,301

            #6
            Everything seems to get completely overdone these days. When a guy loses one fight he is suddenly a complete piece of **** or if a guy who has fought no one and is unbeaten, people think he is actually the greatest ever fighter! It's just weird, but also typical of our times and the thinking of society at large.

            Hatton is neither a bum nor a great champion. He is just a good champion for his particular time and that is about all there is to it. There is no need to overrate him or underrate him.

            He beat the aging, reigning champ who had dominated for a decade which threw him into the spotlight and has since beaten some semi decent challengers but never really done anything worthy of the HOF and then lost to the best fighter today above his weight class. That's all there is to it. He's good and a champion but certainly nothing special and no better than any other champion who won a belt and kept it for a while.

            Everyone gets too excited over nothing. It's kind of freaky.... There is just not that much to it.

            Comment

            • Pullcounter
              no guts no glory
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 42582
              • 549
              • 191
              • 49,739

              #7
              Originally posted by ATFsven
              i get the impression most posters think that Hatton is a bum with his loss to Mayweather.

              SO who would win at 140 between Hatton and Cotto??
              cotto can't make 140 anymore and when he was at 140 he was even more vulnerable than he is at 147 now. I like Hatton to beat Cotto at 140.

              Comment

              • Team Mayweather
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 200
                • 40
                • 17
                • 514

                #8
                Yep, Hatton is a bum.

                Comment

                • sparked_85
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 6036
                  • 158
                  • 97
                  • 12,597

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Team Mayweather
                  Yep, Hatton is a bum.
                  provide a list on more than 20 fighters who are not bums..............

                  Comment

                  • KESSLER
                    GOONER FOR LIFE
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 15487
                    • 782
                    • 716
                    • 24,000

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Team Mayweather
                    Yep, Hatton is a bum.
                    No..... ?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP