If Hopkins and Calzaghe fought in their prime...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KingTito
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 9391
    • 234
    • 350
    • 22,960

    #1

    If Hopkins and Calzaghe fought in their prime...

    Who do u think would win?

    I went with B-Hop
    56
    Bernard Hopkins
    35.71%
    20
    Joe Calzaghe
    64.29%
    36
  • AntonTheMeh
    STOP CRYIN
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 21222
    • 700
    • 709
    • 31,623

    #2
    hard to say,they've both aged well.

    Comment

    • Orion
      hipp
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 1787
      • 113
      • 101
      • 8,405

      #3
      Hopkins is gonna win now and Calzaghe is in his prime....

      Comment

      • Steak
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2006
        • 10713
        • 509
        • 268
        • 17,902

        #4
        most people cant even really agree on when a fighters prime is tho, thats the problem.

        Ive seen all of Calzaghe's major fights...against Reid, Mitchell, Lacy, Eubank, Veit I and II, Sheika, and Kessler(but not Brewer) and I honestly thought he looked his best against Kessler and Lacy...

        I havent seen as much of Hopkins tho. what would be considered his prime?

        Comment

        • Addison
          THE COLDEST
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 19097
          • 2,375
          • 4,510
          • 27,222

          #5
          I have the same amount of faith in both guys at this stage as I did 5 years ago. Perhaps even slightly more in old man Hopkins..

          Comment

          • Crazylegs77
            null and void
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 13101
            • 445
            • 296
            • 21,573

            #6
            Originally posted by KingTito
            Who do u think would win?

            I went with B-Hop
            No clue, I dont remember Hopkins being some amazing fighter in his prime, seems like he peaked late in life with Tito and after. Same goes for Joe.

            Comment

            • feed-the-goat
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 802
              • 23
              • 0
              • 6,977

              #7
              calzaghe as always been a far better boxer than hopkins in every sense and would never have been beaten of him imo at any point. He's just too good for people like Hopkins

              Comment

              • Silencers
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 21957
                • 505
                • 235
                • 32,983

                #8
                Hard to say, their styles would always give each other problems. Hopkins was at his best at around 1997-1999, Calzaghe from 2001-2003. Calzaghe is a very good boxer, he goes a little wild at times but he can be a very good textbook boxer. Hopkins was much more active and was very good at offense and defense but wasn't as technically sound as Calzaghe but his rough tactics and smarts could give Calzaghe trouble. Toss up IMO.

                Comment

                • feed-the-goat
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 802
                  • 23
                  • 0
                  • 6,977

                  #9
                  Originally posted by crazylegs77
                  No clue, I dont remember Hopkins being some amazing fighter in his prime, seems like he peaked late in life with Tito and after. Same goes for Joe.
                  Joe beat Eubank in his early twenties, no way was hopkins beating a fighter of that calibre at such a young age

                  Comment

                  • TheGreatA
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 14143
                    • 633
                    • 271
                    • 21,863

                    #10
                    Originally posted by blackirish137
                    most people cant even really agree on when a fighters prime is tho, thats the problem.

                    Ive seen all of Calzaghe's major fights...against Reid, Mitchell, Lacy, Eubank, Veit I and II, Sheika, and Kessler(but not Brewer) and I honestly thought he looked his best against Kessler and Lacy...

                    I havent seen as much of Hopkins tho. what would be considered his prime?
                    I would guess from 1997 to 2001.
                    The Glen Johnson and Tito Trinidad fights are IMO his best performances.


                    Hopkins vs Glen Johnson


                    Hopkins vs Trinidad

                    After the fight with Trinidad, Hopkins turned into this:


                    The days of being the 'Executioner' were over.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP