So, if we were to put two fighters, one from each, of equal ability in their own style (either boxing or mma) not under Marquess of Queensbury. Who do you think would win? Essentially, which sport builds the better fighter?
This all stems from a few things. My brother was showing me some UFC fighting videos today and was saying how a boxer couldn't last 2 seconds with them. I was watching the clips with him and kept seeing places where the UFs just left totally open where in a boxing match they'd be seriously punished for it. I mean, imagine a pro' boxer fighting with his hands down by his chin, he'd be crossed and hooked until the ref' stopped it. But then again, they have much more technical skill, knowing martial arts.
Also, I just watched the advert for "Don't back down" and in it a kid says "boxing just doesn't cut it anymore"...
I think a boxer could destroy and MMA. A pro boxer is learnt to inflict damage with his hands an MMA is often about submission. I don't think a boxer would allow the kicks to the head effect them as they'd be much more defensive with their hands. UFs also seem to be quite slow, they contact with each other less, I think a boxer would exploit this reservation to fight. That all said, just because a boxer doesn't use his legs, it doesn't mean he is totally incapable! If a boxer fought someone who is trained in MMA etc it doesn't mean he'd just fight with his fists, i'm sure he'd utilise his legs which are usually powerful because they are important to stability in boxing. I think a boxer still has the edge in a street fight, MMA, UFC, whatever the **** you want to doll it up as.
What do you all think?
This all stems from a few things. My brother was showing me some UFC fighting videos today and was saying how a boxer couldn't last 2 seconds with them. I was watching the clips with him and kept seeing places where the UFs just left totally open where in a boxing match they'd be seriously punished for it. I mean, imagine a pro' boxer fighting with his hands down by his chin, he'd be crossed and hooked until the ref' stopped it. But then again, they have much more technical skill, knowing martial arts.
Also, I just watched the advert for "Don't back down" and in it a kid says "boxing just doesn't cut it anymore"...
I think a boxer could destroy and MMA. A pro boxer is learnt to inflict damage with his hands an MMA is often about submission. I don't think a boxer would allow the kicks to the head effect them as they'd be much more defensive with their hands. UFs also seem to be quite slow, they contact with each other less, I think a boxer would exploit this reservation to fight. That all said, just because a boxer doesn't use his legs, it doesn't mean he is totally incapable! If a boxer fought someone who is trained in MMA etc it doesn't mean he'd just fight with his fists, i'm sure he'd utilise his legs which are usually powerful because they are important to stability in boxing. I think a boxer still has the edge in a street fight, MMA, UFC, whatever the **** you want to doll it up as.
What do you all think?
Comment