I do not like Floyd Mayweather. I hate to see the way a boxer of such extravagant gifts runs the sport down and wastes time fighting the Big Show. But...I do think some of his more agressive critics go overboard in attacking his record and choice of opponents.
First, I think that in reality, his much derided bouts with De la Hoya and Hatton, were in fact the two most credible bouts he could have taken at the time. (I saw someone saying something like this in another thread, and it got me thinking). De la Hoya is (or was) considered to be one of the only fighters with the natural gifts to trouble Floyd. Sure he was aging, but his extra size and (presumably) power, meant that expecting him to win was at least realistic. When the fight happened, it was hardly a mismatch and Floyd simply proved to be the better boxer, which was exactly what he needed to do. If he hadn't fought the Golden Boy, then the question of which of these two amazing fighters was the best would never have been answered, and doubts would persist. Floyd made the right choice.
The same, broadly speaking, is true of Hatton, who IMO was an even more credible contender than De La Hoya. I know a lot of US fans don't like him, but he was at the time an undefeated junior welterweight (an ideal weight for Floyd) monster, who had beaten the man in Tsyzu and come up to welter and successfully taken titles. Based on past Floyd fights like Castillo 1, he also appeared to have the style, that if any could, might trouble Floyd. Again, Floyd faced him and beat him easily. Question answered again.
I do not believe that there were another two fighters out there than the gifted, bigger veteran that De La Hoya was and the up and coming unbeatable Hatton, that Floyd could have more credibly faced. In one way, Floyd beat the past, and he beat the future.
Now to the present, Miguel Cotto. I agree Floyd should fight him, but for those who accuse Floyd of ducking, is he really?. Do you honestly, in your heart of hearts belive that Cotto beats Floyd? I do not. IMO, Cotto, talent and style wise, falls somewhere between De La Hoya and Hatton, without actually having the particular gifts of either. He is a pressure fighter like Hatton, but his style is more like that of the aging de La Hoya, come ahead and somewhat predicatable. He doesn't quite have Hatton's speed, but nor does he have (IMO) the power of the larger De La Hoya. I think, in fact, that he is tailor made for Floyd, and we would see a very similar fight to Floyd/ De La Hoya, with Floyd, basically picking off the bigger man from range and getting a wide UD. If anyone has reasons why this is not the case, then I would love to hear it.
So to conclude, I think that basically Floyd believes that he has proved everything he needs to prove, and I think he is right. Sure, it would be nice to see Cotto v Mayweather, but the reality is we've seen it before, and we already know the result. Floyd has been around a long time and those who accuse him of ducking, and being a coward might perhaps benefit from a bit of perspective. Loathsome as he may be, he is by far the most gifted boxer in the world today and to be frank, he looks pretty close to unbeatable. If he wanted to, he could forge an even more impressive legacy, but at the end of the day, that is up to him. It would be great if he did, because we would get to see more of a remarkable talent, but I don't think we need to, because we already know he is the best.
________
LOS ANGELES DISPENSARIES
First, I think that in reality, his much derided bouts with De la Hoya and Hatton, were in fact the two most credible bouts he could have taken at the time. (I saw someone saying something like this in another thread, and it got me thinking). De la Hoya is (or was) considered to be one of the only fighters with the natural gifts to trouble Floyd. Sure he was aging, but his extra size and (presumably) power, meant that expecting him to win was at least realistic. When the fight happened, it was hardly a mismatch and Floyd simply proved to be the better boxer, which was exactly what he needed to do. If he hadn't fought the Golden Boy, then the question of which of these two amazing fighters was the best would never have been answered, and doubts would persist. Floyd made the right choice.
The same, broadly speaking, is true of Hatton, who IMO was an even more credible contender than De La Hoya. I know a lot of US fans don't like him, but he was at the time an undefeated junior welterweight (an ideal weight for Floyd) monster, who had beaten the man in Tsyzu and come up to welter and successfully taken titles. Based on past Floyd fights like Castillo 1, he also appeared to have the style, that if any could, might trouble Floyd. Again, Floyd faced him and beat him easily. Question answered again.
I do not believe that there were another two fighters out there than the gifted, bigger veteran that De La Hoya was and the up and coming unbeatable Hatton, that Floyd could have more credibly faced. In one way, Floyd beat the past, and he beat the future.
Now to the present, Miguel Cotto. I agree Floyd should fight him, but for those who accuse Floyd of ducking, is he really?. Do you honestly, in your heart of hearts belive that Cotto beats Floyd? I do not. IMO, Cotto, talent and style wise, falls somewhere between De La Hoya and Hatton, without actually having the particular gifts of either. He is a pressure fighter like Hatton, but his style is more like that of the aging de La Hoya, come ahead and somewhat predicatable. He doesn't quite have Hatton's speed, but nor does he have (IMO) the power of the larger De La Hoya. I think, in fact, that he is tailor made for Floyd, and we would see a very similar fight to Floyd/ De La Hoya, with Floyd, basically picking off the bigger man from range and getting a wide UD. If anyone has reasons why this is not the case, then I would love to hear it.
So to conclude, I think that basically Floyd believes that he has proved everything he needs to prove, and I think he is right. Sure, it would be nice to see Cotto v Mayweather, but the reality is we've seen it before, and we already know the result. Floyd has been around a long time and those who accuse him of ducking, and being a coward might perhaps benefit from a bit of perspective. Loathsome as he may be, he is by far the most gifted boxer in the world today and to be frank, he looks pretty close to unbeatable. If he wanted to, he could forge an even more impressive legacy, but at the end of the day, that is up to him. It would be great if he did, because we would get to see more of a remarkable talent, but I don't think we need to, because we already know he is the best.
________
LOS ANGELES DISPENSARIES
Comment