Ok.Just saw the Pac-JMM rematch & clear as day Pac won. Why the controversy?

[D_Chosen_1]

Why were all these people all week long whining about how JMM should have won and was robbed? Ridiculous! Pac landed the more telling blows and was clearly dominant with the knockdown and flush shots he was landing down the pipe. JMM had a few decent rounds, but nothing that would convince you that he won the fight. I just think there are way too many nut huggers who can't face reality. It's ok; let it soak in for a while. You'll get over it.

[Run]

I think the first person who should get over it...........would be the ******* still making threads a week after the fight is over.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[flipbjefrox]

some people have a hard time scoring this fight. i dont understand it as well. i think it's because jmm has this style to neutralize opponents offense. people take that as ring generalship. so when they see pacquiao not throwing as much punch as theyre used to seeing, they attribute that to jmm's defense but they forget to see that pac is still landing flush shots. just my two cents

[Orion]

It was a very close fight i can see it for either warrior, they were just meant to be together in that ring thats for sure.

[flipbjefrox]

I think the first person who should get over it...........would be the ******* still making threads a week after the fight is over.

mayber its his first time watching it

[loui_ludwig]

some people have a hard time scoring this fight. i dont understand it as well. i think it's because jmm has this style to neutralize opponents offense. people take that as ring generalship. so when they see pacquiao not throwing as much punch as theyre used to seeing, they attribute that to jmm's defense but they forget to see that pac is still landing flush shots. just my two cents

They focus too much on JMM's counter skills. When you look at the fight, Pac has been putting up his hands on defense. JMM was hitting gloves also.

[D_Chosen_1]

mayber its his first time watching it

Thank-you. I'm glad someone knows how to read as I clearly put in the thread title that this was my first time watching the fight.

[Run]

Thank-you. I'm glad someone knows how to read as I clearly put in the thread title that this was my first time watching the fight.

Agreed. Stop the presses.

We'll be sure to skip most major fights, then wait a week later for your analysis which as always is well timed.

While you're on the subject, what are your thoughts about the first fight?

After all you probably just saw that last Tuesday? No?



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[flipbjefrox]

They focus too much on JMM's counter skills. When you look at the fight, Pac has been putting up his hands on defense. JMM was hitting gloves also.

its probably why there's such disparity between the sports broadcaster on tv than online boxing writers. most boxing analyst on tv are fan of the sweet science thus majority of them scores it for jmm. online boxing analyst majority are the new blood of the sports who do not focus mainly on the sweet science but more on the brute force and aggressiveness of the fighter ala steve kim and doug fisher of max boxing

[Domain]

I think the first person who should get over it...........would be the ******* still making threads a week after the fight is over.

You talking bout Ferocity?