The illusion of Floyd's #1pfp status.

[SkillspayBills]

Serious question, if you are a BOXING fan why do you only post about Floyd Mayweather? Seriously I would like to know.

.................................................. ..

[COACH WEBB]

Easy-E stated that Floyd last 2 wins were against fighters that are a lock for the HOF. While that might be true, only 1 of them was a prime, active fighter. The other was almost a decade past his prime and inactive. It was a good win for Floyd, given Floyd went up to 154 to face him, but lets not make it seem as if Floyd beat the "hof" version of Oscar. That's all.

ok. name a PRIME HOF that Cotto has fought and beat then....

[COACH WEBB]

I like Cotto. This is not about him. This is about you dee...

[COACH WEBB]

..........................

yea and once Cotto and May fight, we will hear 1 Million reasons why it was NOT good enough. But this guy continues to say he is a fan of boxing, but his entire thread career consist of...YOU NAMED IT: MAYWEATHER!!!

[Bad_Barracuda]

U are giving Floyd credit for beating an end of his career Oscar, at a time when Oscar was inactive. If Floyd had faced a "prime" Oscar, then his win would have more meaning to it. Just because Oscar is a lock for the HOF, doesnt mean that Floyd fought the HOF version of him.

If Cotto faced a "prime" Shane Mosley then his win have more meaning to it.

Just because Shane is a lock for the HOF doesn't mean that Cotto fought the HOF version of him..

I can do the same **** to Cotto

See how that works Donkey?

[Boofdatruth]

According to them, Shane was old and past it when Cotto fought him, yet they seem to think that Floyd fought a prime, active Oscar.

shane and dlh were past their better days..........nothing like how they fought when they were in their prime........floyd has beaten guys ranked pfp and has done this since early in his career...........he is waiting for this welter mess to settle to find out who might be his next big fight......cotto fans are scared to death he might lose to margs...........margs fans too are scared of losing to cotto............lol.....it is so funny to see you guys squirm.........lol...........

[Boofdatruth]

You never heard me say that. I said it was a SOLID victory. People act like he fought a grandpa in that ring. He fought a world class fighter who, without a doubt, was not in his prime but was still enough to compete with and beat anyone near or around his weight.

in the twilight of his career.........shane beat collazo who never beat a top 10 fighter.........he also beat estrada who never beat a top 10 fighter.....when estrada beat smith, smith never beat a top 10 fighter and both were fighting some kind of elimination fight...........shane had experience over both of those guys.......so go figure.......the rankings these days are ridiculous........shane was old when he fought cotto........and was in the fight because cotto has no right hand and suspect defense.......

[deevel79]

[QUOTE=Money May;3550100]

U are giving Floyd credit for beating an end of his career Oscar, at a time when Oscar was inactive. If Floyd had faced a "prime" Oscar, then his win would have more meaning to it. Just because Oscar is a lock for the HOF, doesnt mean that Floyd fought the HOF version of him.[/QUOTE

you discredit a Oscar win, but jump crazy for Cotto's SLIGHT victory over Mosley? you are a joke..and you call yourself a fan of boxing??

Yea, and I have some land in Rhode Island that I would LOVE to sell you!!!!!!

I never discredited Floyd's win over Oscar. Like i said in my last post, it was a good victory for him, given that he went up to 154 to face and beat him. I was only trying to make the point that Oscar was no where near prime or active when Floyd beat him. Easy E was trying to say otherwise. As for Cotto's win over Shane, i feel it was a solid win for him aswell, but also recognize that he too was past his prime. I give him a little more credit because Shane was more active, and seemed as if he still had more left in the tank than Oscar did.

[Bad_Barracuda]

[QUOTE=deevel79;3550204]

I never discredited Floyd's win over Oscar. Like i said in my last post, it was a good victory for him, given that he went up to 154 to face and beat him. I was only trying to make the point that Oscar was no where near prime or active when Floyd beat him. Easy E was trying to say otherwise. As for Cotto's win over Shane, i feel it was a solid win for him aswell, but also recognize that he too was past his prime. I give him a little more credit because Shane was more active, and seemed as if he still had more left in the tank than Oscar did.

Shane is older and has taken worse beatings than Oscar..

He's never been the same after Forrest..

Not only that..

Going back down to 147 is murder on a 36y/o fighter..

[SkillspayBills]

[QUOTE=deevel79;3550204]

I never discredited Floyd's win over Oscar. Like i said in my last post, it was a good victory for him, given that he went up to 154 to face and beat him. I was only trying to make the point that Oscar was no where near prime or active when Floyd beat him. Easy E was trying to say otherwise. As for Cotto's win over Shane, i feel it was a solid win for him aswell, but also recognize that he too was past his prime. I give him a little more credit because Shane was more active, and seemed as if he still had more left in the tank than Oscar did.

Serious question, if you are a BOXING fan why do you only post about Floyd Mayweather? Seriously I would like to know.