Who would win this matchup? I'll take Peter.
How do you have? Same Peter vs. David Haye
Collapse
-
I reckon Haye could get a late TKO. Peter is too slow and Haye's big right hand will make him shy.Comment
-
Comment
-
Sure Haye is vastly more talented than Peter, but until he gets that left hand up, he will continue top be caught by rights like he was against Mormeck. Haye's left-hand down=Peter KO, Haye left hand up, UD win because of how telegraphed that right is from Peter, haye is fleet-footedComment
-
Haye winning a safety first performance to outbox Peter for 12 ,quite a dull fight with Haye not taking to many chancesComment
-
Yup, all you need to do is box, and use good movement and you beat peter. haye is much to quick for peter. barring peter landing a big shot i don't see him winning.Comment
-
Haye could stop Peter depending on how good Peter's chin is it has proved to be pretty granite.
Haye is another level of fighter than Peter.
Peter is not the best, he really isn't. Haye would light him up, he's too slow for Haye. Haye could even get away with keeping his left low the speed disparity is so great.
Peter telegraphs everything but he's no George Foreman so he won't get away with it in world class company.
A frightened Wlad whooped him, Maskaev hurt him and he was shot to piece, nearly man McCline should have stopped him, and James Toney is pretty much done with boxing I give him a tiny bit of credit.
I'm not even sure Peter beats he other British heavies, seriously.Comment
-
I think Haye would eventually KO the overrated Peter, unless Peter landed a direct, hard rabbit punch.Comment
Comment