More Controversial Split Decision?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UnderPressure
    Nilaga
    • Apr 2007
    • 0
    • 27
    • 18
    • 7,287

    #1

    More Controversial Split Decision?

    Morales Barrera I or Pacquiao-Marquez II?
    23
    Morales-Barrera I
    82.61%
    19
    Pacquiao-Marquez II
    17.39%
    4
  • Silencers
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 21957
    • 505
    • 235
    • 32,983

    #2
    Barrera-Morales 1. Because I had Barrera winning pretty clearly especially with the KD. Marquez-Pacquiao 2 was a much closer fight and could've gone either way.

    Comment

    • Mr. Ryan
      Guest
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2004
      • 23429
      • 1,301
      • 1,089
      • 29,664

      #3
      Both fights it was difficult to separate the combatants and come up with a clear verdict that satisfies everyone. In Barrera-Morales I, I felt it was clear that Barrera doing the most damage. I scored it for Barrera, but it could've gone either way.

      Same with Pacquiao-Marquez II, tough fight to score but I went with Pacquiao because his punches were flashier.

      Comment

      • J_CON
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 1779
        • 32
        • 2
        • 10,087

        #4
        I'm going to say pac vs juan since it seams that more people are whining about it

        Comment

        • Chups
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 18400
          • 1,835
          • 1,281
          • 52,879

          #5
          Originally posted by J_CON
          I'm going to say pac vs juan since it seams that more people are whining about it
          The boxing forums did not exist in the first few years of 2000.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP