Whose "Fouling Techniques" annoy you the most?!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deevel79
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 6831
    • 213
    • 27
    • 13,404

    #21
    What bothers me is fans who are quick to call someone else a cheater for fouls, yet when their favorite fighters do it, they say "well its a fight, u do what u have to do to win"

    Comment

    • TheGreatA
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 14143
      • 633
      • 271
      • 21,863

      #22
      Sam Peter for rabbit-punching/hitting when his opponents are down.

      He should learn how to use the uppercut so he won't have to rabbit punch people who are ducking. Otherwise he will eventually be DQ'd by a strict referee.


      3:18


      3:35


      1:55


      0:15 When Peter finally uses the uppercut it's an illegal one.


      Peter vs Maskaev 0:55
      Last edited by TheGreatA; 03-14-2008, 08:57 AM.

      Comment

      • THE REED
        Sixty Forty
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 43489
        • 1,992
        • 1,483
        • 690,068,075

        #23
        I dont think Sam Peters is as bad as people make it out to be... hes not aiming for the back of the head, but a lot of his opponents will lean forward or turn when he punches, like james toney for instance, and its actually the opponent that causes themselves to get hit to the back of the head... If someone is punching you, and you turn or, make a lateral movement and the punch catches part of your head, thats not Sams fault I dont believe.

        Manny Stewart said the same thing after Jim Lampley addressed the rabbid punches, by saying exactly what I described Saturday Night.

        Comment

        • TheGreatA
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 14143
          • 633
          • 271
          • 21,863

          #24
          Well it certainly seems to me like Peter doesn't give a f*** where he lands the punch as long as it does damage. Even if the opponent is already down.
          Same with Andrew Golota's low blows.

          It's illegal and dangerous, the uppercut should be used when the opponent is ducking down with his head.

          Last edited by TheGreatA; 03-14-2008, 09:05 AM.

          Comment

          • beez721
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2005
            • 9637
            • 252
            • 55
            • 16,400

            #25
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss
            I dont think Sam Peters is as bad as people make it out to be... hes not aiming for the back of the head, but a lot of his opponents will lean forward or turn when he punches, like james toney for instance, and its actually the opponent that causes themselves to get hit to the back of the head... If someone is punching you, and you turn or, make a lateral movement and the punch catches part of your head, thats not Sams fault I dont believe.

            Manny Stewart said the same thing after Jim Lampley addressed the rabbid punches, by saying exactly what I described Saturday Night.
            if that was the case,,,why arent these guys getting hit in the back of the head by anyone else? its always sam peter for a reason

            Comment

            • freedom213
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 3388
              • 112
              • 164
              • 10,016

              #26
              Mayweather Is A Blatant Fouler And Has Slid By For Far Too Long. Some Of The Elbows And Forearms He "uses" Throughout A Fight A Pretty Damaging.

              Comment

              • warp1432
                the mailman
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 14406
                • 478
                • 347
                • 24,060

                #27
                Rabbit punching is cruel. Coming in with your head is just straight on, but Rabbit punching on the back of the head sucks.

                Comment

                • -Antonio-
                  -Antonio-
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 24259
                  • 629
                  • 163
                  • 38,153

                  #28
                  I cant stand what excessive clinching does to the excitement of a fight. So I voted that.

                  But I mean if you mean the most costly, most dangerous, etc. then yeah Peter is it.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP