Sam Peter: "Im ze Undisputed, Undefeated Champ"

[AndersonSilva]

Want a tissue?

u want sum stitches slut

[lennon]

I am positive Sam Peter has a Loss... to the REAL undisputed Champ..

AWAITS some Childish hate from LILB

In fact Peter can claim the true lineage from the last champion, Lennox Lewis.

If you dont agree then you didnt consider Vitali the champ either when he beat Sanders who had just beaten Wlad.

Technically if you follow the lineage then Peter is THE CHAMP.

After Lewis retired Vitali Klitschko faced Sanders who had just knocked out Wladimir Klitschko. The winner won Lewis`s title, the title then went from Vitali to Rahman who lost it to Maskaev who lost to Peter.

At the time that Vitali won the title Wlad had been ko`d, Byrd held a belt but wasnt considered champ. Vitali was considered THE champ, he held the ring belt and WBC and lineage back to Lewis as well a shaving defeate dthe true WBO champion. Wlad went on to win Byrds belt but since Byrd wasnt considered champ it meant nothing.

The true lineage from Lewis went to Vitali, even many Klitschko fans considered that Vitali actually beat Lewis anyway, Vitali was the man, Peter holds that lineage, that lineage also goes back to Wlads unavenged defeat to Sanders for the WBO title. So technically he holds the true WBO lineage, RING belt lineage as well as the Undisputed WBC title.

Wlads WBO belt only comes from his loss to Brewster for the vacant title.

Now that Vitali is coming back and as the undefeated former champion he is facing Peter next and that will solidify the winner as the true champ along the true lineage from Lewis.

[Enayze]

u want sum stitches slut

Can someone please ban this 12 year old internet thug.

[lennon]

lol............

The fight was for the Undisputed WBC title, the Interim champ vs. the champ, or did you miss that bit?
Thats why Peter held 2 WBC belts in the ring at the end!

[Enayze]

In fact Peter can claim the true lineage from the last champion, Lennox Lewis.

If you dont agree then you didnt consider Vitali the champ either when he beat Sanders who had just beaten Wlad.

Technically if you follow the lineage then Peter is THE CHAMP.

After Lewis retired Vitali Klitschko faced Sanders who had just knocked out Wladimir Klitschko. The winner won Lewis`s title, the title then went from Vitali to Rahman who lost it to Maskaev who lost to Peter.

At the time that Vitali won the title Wlad had been ko`d, Byrd held a belt but wasnt considered champ. Vitali was considered THE champ, he held the ring belt and WBC and lineage back to Lewis as well a shaving defeate dthe true WBO champion. Wlad went on to win Byrds belt but since Byrd wasnt considered champ it meant nothing.

The true lineage from Lewis went to Vitali, even many Klitschko fans considered that Vitali actually beat Lewis anyway, Vitali was the man, Peter holds that lineage, that lineage also goes back to Wlads unavenged defeat to Sanders for the WBO title. So technically he holds the true WBO lineage, RING belt lineage as well as the Undisputed WBC title.

Wlads WBO belt only comes from his loss to Brewster for the vacant title.

Now that Vitali is coming back and as the undefeated former champion he is facing Peter next and that will solidify the winner as the true champ along the true lineage from Lewis.

You go right ahead and be the only dummy in the boxing community to consider him champ.

[Leo Pradun]

Jame Toney is da best fighter says Peter, not a even true hw

[WLAD OWNS]

u want sum stitches slut

Your boy Peter is a borderline ****** and he will get KTFO by Vitali or Wlad in a rematch...The truth hurts, dosen't it?...*****.

[Enayze]

The fight was for the Undisputed WBC title, the Interim champ vs. the champ, or did you miss that bit?
Thats why Peter held 2 WBC belts in the ring at the end!

Peter however didn't say I am the undisputed WBC champ, it was also very clear what he was implying, and you also left out him claiming to be undefeated, I guess he meant he was undefeated in his last 3 fights?

[Welter_Skelter]

In fact Peter can claim the true lineage from the last champion, Lennox Lewis.

If you dont agree then you didnt consider Vitali the champ either when he beat Sanders who had just beaten Wlad.

Technically if you follow the lineage then Peter is THE CHAMP.

After Lewis retired Vitali Klitschko faced Sanders who had just knocked out Wladimir Klitschko. The winner won Lewis`s title, the title then went from Vitali to Rahman who lost it to Maskaev who lost to Peter.

At the time that Vitali won the title Wlad had been ko`d, Byrd held a belt but wasnt considered champ. Vitali was considered THE champ, he held the ring belt and WBC and lineage back to Lewis as well a shaving defeate dthe true WBO champion. Wlad went on to win Byrds belt but since Byrd wasnt considered champ it meant nothing.

The true lineage from Lewis went to Vitali, even many Klitschko fans considered that Vitali actually beat Lewis anyway, Vitali was the man, Peter holds that lineage, that lineage also goes back to Wlads unavenged defeat to Sanders for the WBO title. So technically he holds the true WBO lineage, RING belt lineage as well as the Undisputed WBC title.

Wlads WBO belt only comes from his loss to Brewster for the vacant title.

Now that Vitali is coming back and as the undefeated former champion he is facing Peter next and that will solidify the winner as the true champ along the true lineage from Lewis.

I am dis*****g that Sam Peter is the Man.. and I know many people are.. that is all I was referring to.. and that the Man with 2 belts Has more claim to the title of "undisputed" than Sam Peter.. The Lineage is long since dead My friend..
Thank you for the recent WBC Heavyweight lesson..

[AndersonSilva]

haha *** yall clowns^